Docs don't show these as bullets because they are in a note block. Looking at the other code it should be like this. (#1810)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -75,9 +75,11 @@ The execution order of advisors in the chain is determined by the `getOrder()` m
|
|||||||
[NOTE]
|
[NOTE]
|
||||||
====
|
====
|
||||||
The seeming contradiction between order and execution sequence is due to the stack-like nature of the advisor chain:
|
The seeming contradiction between order and execution sequence is due to the stack-like nature of the advisor chain:
|
||||||
* An advisor with the highest precedence (lowest order value) is added to the top of the stack.
|
|
||||||
* It will be the first to process the request as the stack unwinds.
|
- An advisor with the highest precedence (lowest order value) is added to the top of the stack.
|
||||||
* It will be the last to process the response as the stack rewinds.
|
- It will be the first to process the request as the stack unwinds.
|
||||||
|
- It will be the last to process the response as the stack rewinds.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
====
|
====
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As a reminder, here are the semantics of the Spring `Ordered` interface:
|
As a reminder, here are the semantics of the Spring `Ordered` interface:
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user