Merge branch '2.6.x' into 2.7.x
Closes gh-30466
This commit is contained in:
@@ -717,8 +717,10 @@ In this case, unless your record has multiple constructors, there is no need to
|
||||
|
||||
Nested members of a `@ConstructorBinding` class (such as `Security` in the example above) will also be bound through their constructor.
|
||||
|
||||
Default values can be specified using `@DefaultValue` and the same conversion service will be applied to coerce the `String` value to the target type of a missing property.
|
||||
By default, if no properties are bound to `Security`, the `MyProperties` instance will contain a `null` value for `security`.
|
||||
Default values can be specified using `@DefaultValue` on a constructor parameter or, when using Java 16 or later, a record component.
|
||||
The conversion service will be applied to coerce the `String` value to the target type of a missing property.
|
||||
|
||||
Referring to the previous example, if no properties are bound to `Security`, the `MyProperties` instance will contain a `null` value for `security`.
|
||||
If you wish you return a non-null instance of `Security` even when no properties are bound to it, you can use an empty `@DefaultValue` annotation to do so:
|
||||
|
||||
include::code:nonnull/MyProperties[tag=*]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user