Merge branch '6.2.x'
This commit is contained in:
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ following sections to make this pattern much easier to implement.
|
||||
== MockMvc and WebDriver Setup
|
||||
|
||||
To use Selenium WebDriver with `MockMvc`, make sure that your project includes a test
|
||||
dependency on `org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-htmlunit3-driver`.
|
||||
dependency on `org.seleniumhq.selenium:htmlunit3-driver`.
|
||||
|
||||
We can easily create a Selenium WebDriver that integrates with MockMvc by using the
|
||||
`MockMvcHtmlUnitDriverBuilder` as the following example shows:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,10 +1,26 @@
|
||||
[[spring-mvc-test-client]]
|
||||
= Testing Client Applications
|
||||
|
||||
You can use client-side tests to test code that internally uses the `RestTemplate`. The
|
||||
idea is to declare expected requests and to provide "`stub`" responses so that you can
|
||||
focus on testing the code in isolation (that is, without running a server). The following
|
||||
example shows how to do so:
|
||||
To test code that uses the `RestClient` or `RestTemplate`, you can use a mock web server, such as
|
||||
https://github.com/square/okhttp#mockwebserver[OkHttp MockWebServer] or
|
||||
https://wiremock.org/[WireMock]. Mock web servers accept requests over HTTP like a regular
|
||||
server, and that means you can test with the same HTTP client that is also configured in
|
||||
the same way as in production, which is important because there are often subtle
|
||||
differences in the way different clients handle network I/O. Another advantage of mock
|
||||
web servers is the ability to simulate specific network issues and conditions at the
|
||||
transport level, in combination with the client used in production.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to dedicated mock web servers, historically the Spring Framework has provided
|
||||
a built-in option to test `RestClient` or `RestTemplate` through `MockRestServiceServer`.
|
||||
This relies on configuring the client under test with a custom `ClientHttpRequestFactory`
|
||||
backed by the mock server that is in turn set up to expect requests and send "`stub`"
|
||||
responses so that you can focus on testing the code in isolation, without running a server.
|
||||
|
||||
TIP: `MockRestServiceServer` predates the existence of mock web servers. At present, we
|
||||
recommend using mock web servers for more complete testing of the transport layer and
|
||||
network conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows an example of using `MockRestServiceServer`:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,9 +2,16 @@
|
||||
= Testing
|
||||
:page-section-summary-toc: 1
|
||||
|
||||
To test code that uses the `WebClient`, you can use a mock web server, such as the
|
||||
https://github.com/square/okhttp#mockwebserver[OkHttp MockWebServer]. To see an example
|
||||
of its use, check out
|
||||
To test code that uses the `WebClient`, you can use a mock web server, such as
|
||||
https://github.com/square/okhttp#mockwebserver[OkHttp MockWebServer] or
|
||||
https://wiremock.org/[WireMock]. Mock web servers accept requests over HTTP like a regular
|
||||
server, and that means you can test with the same HTTP client that is also configured in
|
||||
the same way as in production, which is important because there are often subtle
|
||||
differences in the way different clients handle network I/O. Another advantage of mock
|
||||
web servers is the ability to simulate specific network issues and conditions at the
|
||||
transport level, in combination with the client used in production.
|
||||
|
||||
For example use of MockWebServer, see
|
||||
{spring-framework-code}/spring-webflux/src/test/java/org/springframework/web/reactive/function/client/WebClientIntegrationTests.java[`WebClientIntegrationTests`]
|
||||
in the Spring Framework test suite or the
|
||||
https://github.com/square/okhttp/tree/master/samples/static-server[`static-server`]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,11 +34,7 @@ Controllers can then return a `Flux<List<B>>`; Reactor provides a dedicated oper
|
||||
| `HttpHeaders`
|
||||
| For returning a response with headers and no body.
|
||||
|
||||
| `ErrorResponse`
|
||||
| To render an RFC 9457 error response with details in the body,
|
||||
see xref:web/webflux/ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[Error Responses]
|
||||
|
||||
| `ProblemDetail`
|
||||
| `ErrorResponse`, `ProblemDetail`
|
||||
| To render an RFC 9457 error response with details in the body,
|
||||
see xref:web/webflux/ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[Error Responses]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,18 +10,20 @@ to any controller. Moreover, as of 5.3, `@ExceptionHandler` methods in `@Control
|
||||
can be used to handle exceptions from any `@Controller` or any other handler.
|
||||
|
||||
`@ControllerAdvice` is meta-annotated with `@Component` and therefore can be registered as
|
||||
a Spring bean through xref:core/beans/java/instantiating-container.adoc#beans-java-instantiating-container-scan[component scanning]
|
||||
. `@RestControllerAdvice` is meta-annotated with `@ControllerAdvice`
|
||||
and `@ResponseBody`, and that means `@ExceptionHandler` methods will have their return
|
||||
value rendered via response body message conversion, rather than via HTML views.
|
||||
a Spring bean through xref:core/beans/java/instantiating-container.adoc#beans-java-instantiating-container-scan[component scanning].
|
||||
|
||||
`@RestControllerAdvice` is a shortcut annotation that combines `@ControllerAdvice`
|
||||
with `@ResponseBody`, in effect simply an `@ControllerAdvice` whose exception handler
|
||||
methods render to the response body.
|
||||
|
||||
On startup, `RequestMappingHandlerMapping` and `ExceptionHandlerExceptionResolver` detect
|
||||
controller advice beans and apply them at runtime. Global `@ExceptionHandler` methods,
|
||||
from an `@ControllerAdvice`, are applied _after_ local ones, from the `@Controller`.
|
||||
By contrast, global `@ModelAttribute` and `@InitBinder` methods are applied _before_ local ones.
|
||||
|
||||
The `@ControllerAdvice` annotation has attributes that let you narrow the set of controllers
|
||||
and handlers that they apply to. For example:
|
||||
By default, both `@ControllerAdvice` and `@RestControllerAdvice` apply to any controller,
|
||||
including `@Controller` and `@RestController`. Use attributes of the annotation to narrow
|
||||
the set of controllers and handlers that they apply to. For example:
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -177,13 +177,9 @@ the content negotiation during the error handling phase will decide which conten
|
||||
be converted through `HttpMessageConverter` instances and written to the response.
|
||||
See xref:web/webmvc/mvc-controller/ann-methods/responseentity.adoc[ResponseEntity].
|
||||
|
||||
| `ErrorResponse`
|
||||
| `ErrorResponse`, `ProblemDetail`
|
||||
| To render an RFC 9457 error response with details in the body,
|
||||
see xref:web/webmvc/mvc-ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[Error Responses]
|
||||
|
||||
| `ProblemDetail`
|
||||
| To render an RFC 9457 error response with details in the body,
|
||||
see xref:web/webmvc/mvc-ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[Error Responses]
|
||||
see xref:web/webmvc/mvc-ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[Error Responses]
|
||||
|
||||
| `String`
|
||||
| A view name to be resolved with `ViewResolver` implementations and used together with the
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,11 +22,7 @@ supported for all return values.
|
||||
| `HttpHeaders`
|
||||
| For returning a response with headers and no body.
|
||||
|
||||
| `ErrorResponse`
|
||||
| To render an RFC 9457 error response with details in the body,
|
||||
see xref:web/webmvc/mvc-ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[Error Responses]
|
||||
|
||||
| `ProblemDetail`
|
||||
| `ErrorResponse`, `ProblemDetail`
|
||||
| To render an RFC 9457 error response with details in the body,
|
||||
see xref:web/webmvc/mvc-ann-rest-exceptions.adoc[Error Responses]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user