Add section on RFD + whitelist yml/properties/csv
Issue: SPR-13643
This commit is contained in:
@@ -30656,23 +30656,74 @@ configuration. For more information on placeholders, see the javadocs of the
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[mvc-ann-requestmapping-suffix-pattern-match]]
|
||||
===== Path Pattern Matching By Suffix
|
||||
By default Spring MVC automatically performs `".*"` suffix pattern matching so
|
||||
that a controller mapped to `/person` is also implicitly mapped to `/person.*`.
|
||||
This allows indicating content types via file extensions, e.g. `/person.pdf`,
|
||||
`/person.xml`, etc. A common pitfall however is when the last path segment of the
|
||||
mapping is a URI variable, e.g. `/person/{id}`. While a request for `/person/1.json`
|
||||
would correctly result in path variable id=1 and extension ".json", when the id
|
||||
naturally contains a dot, e.g. `/person/joe@email.com` the result does not match
|
||||
expectations. Clearly here ".com" is not a file extension.
|
||||
==== Suffix Pattern Matching
|
||||
By default Spring MVC performs `".{asterisk}"` suffix pattern matching so that a
|
||||
controller mapped to `/person` is also implicitly mapped to `/person.{asterisk}`.
|
||||
This makes it easy to request different representations of a resource through the
|
||||
URL path (e.g. `/person.pdf`, `/person.xml`).
|
||||
|
||||
The proper way to address this is to configure Spring MVC to only do suffix pattern
|
||||
matching against file extensions registered for content negotiation purposes.
|
||||
For more on this, first see <<mvc-config-content-negotiation>> and then
|
||||
<<mvc-config-path-matching>> showing how to enable suffix pattern matching
|
||||
along with how to use registered suffix patterns only.
|
||||
Suffix pattern matching can be turned off or restricted to a set of path extensions
|
||||
explicitly registered for content negotiation purposes. This is generally
|
||||
recommended to minimize ambiguity with common request mappings such as
|
||||
`/person/{id}` where a dot might not represent a file extension, e.g.
|
||||
`/person/joe@email.com` vs `/person/joe@email.com.json`. Furthermore as explained
|
||||
in the note below suffix pattern matching as well as content negotiation may be
|
||||
used in some circumstances to attempt malicious attacks and there are good
|
||||
reasons to restrict them meaningfully.
|
||||
|
||||
See <<mvc-config-path-matching>> for suffix pattern matching configuration and
|
||||
also <<mvc-config-content-negotiation>> for content negotiation configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[mvc-ann-requestmapping-rfd]]
|
||||
==== Suffix Suffix Pattern Matching and RFD
|
||||
|
||||
Reflected file download (RFD) attack was first described in a
|
||||
https://www.trustwave.com/Resources/SpiderLabs-Blog/Reflected-File-Download---A-New-Web-Attack-Vector/[paper by Trustwave]
|
||||
in 2014. The attack is similar to XSS in that it relies on input
|
||||
(e.g. query parameter, URI variable) being reflected in the response.
|
||||
However instead of inserting JavaScript into HTML, an RFD attack relies on the
|
||||
browser switching to perform a download and treating the response as an executable
|
||||
script if double-clicked based on the file extension (e.g. .bat, .cmd).
|
||||
|
||||
In Spring MVC `@ResponseBody` and `ResponseEntity` methods are at risk because
|
||||
they can render different content types which clients can request including
|
||||
via URL path extensions. Note however that neither disabling suffix pattern matching
|
||||
nor disabling the use of path extensions for content negotiation purposes alone
|
||||
are effective at preventing RFD attacks.
|
||||
|
||||
For comprehensive protection against RFD, prior to rendering the response body
|
||||
Spring MVC adds a `Content-Disposition:attachment;filename=f.txt` header to
|
||||
suggest a fixed and safe download file filename. This is done only if the URL
|
||||
path contains a file extension that is neither whitelisted nor explicitly
|
||||
registered for content negotiation purposes. However it may potentially have
|
||||
side effects when URLs are typed directly into a browser.
|
||||
|
||||
Many common path extensions are whitelisted by
|
||||
default. Furthermore REST API calls are typically not meant to be used as URLs
|
||||
directly in browsers. Nevertheless applications that use custom
|
||||
`HttpMessageConverter` implementations can explicitly register file extensions
|
||||
for content negotiation and the Content-Disposition header will not be added
|
||||
for such extensions. See <<mvc-config-content-negotiation>>.
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
This was originally introduced as part of work for
|
||||
http://pivotal.io/security/cve-2015-5211[CVE-2015-5211].
|
||||
Below are additional recommendations from the report:
|
||||
|
||||
* Encode rather than escape JSON responses. This is also an OWASP XSS recommendation.
|
||||
For an example of how to do that with Spring see https://github.com/rwinch/spring-jackson-owasp[spring-jackson-owasp].
|
||||
* Configure suffix pattern matching to be turned off or restricted to explicitly
|
||||
registered suffixes only.
|
||||
* Configure content negotiation with the properties “useJaf” and “ignoreUknownPathExtension”
|
||||
set to false which would result in a 406 response for URLs with unknown extensions.
|
||||
Note however that this may not be an option if URLs are naturally expected to have
|
||||
a dot towards the end.
|
||||
* Add `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` header to responses. Spring Security 4 does
|
||||
this by default.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[mvc-ann-matrix-variables]]
|
||||
@@ -34208,26 +34259,19 @@ And in XML use the `<mvc:interceptors>` element:
|
||||
|
||||
[[mvc-config-content-negotiation]]
|
||||
==== Content Negotiation
|
||||
You can configure how Spring MVC determines the requested media types from the client
|
||||
for request mapping as well as for content negotiation purposes. The available options
|
||||
are to check the file extension in the request URI, the "Accept" header, a request
|
||||
parameter, as well as to fall back on a default content type. By default, file extension
|
||||
in the request URI is checked first and the "Accept" header is checked next.
|
||||
You can configure how Spring MVC determines the requested media types from the request.
|
||||
The available options are to check the URL path for a file extension, check the
|
||||
"Accept" header, a specific query parameter, or to fall back on a default content
|
||||
type when nothing is requested. By default the path extension in the request URI
|
||||
is checked first and the "Accept" header is checked second.
|
||||
|
||||
For file extensions in the request URI, the MVC Java config and the MVC namespace,
|
||||
automatically register extensions such as `.json`, `.xml`, `.rss`, and `.atom` if the
|
||||
corresponding dependencies such as Jackson, JAXB2, or Rome are present on the classpath.
|
||||
Additional extensions may be not need to be registered explicitly if they can be
|
||||
discovered via `ServletContext.getMimeType(String)` or the __Java Activation Framework__
|
||||
(see `javax.activation.MimetypesFileTypeMap`). You can register more extensions with the
|
||||
{javadoc-baseurl}/org/springframework/web/servlet/mvc/method/annotation/RequestMappingHandlerMapping.html#setUseRegisteredSuffixPatternMatch(boolean)[setUseRegisteredSuffixPatternMatch
|
||||
method].
|
||||
The MVC Java config and the MVC namespace register `json`, `xml`, `rss`, `atom` by
|
||||
default if corresponding dependencies are on the classpath. Additional
|
||||
path extension-to-media type mappings may also be registered explicitly and that
|
||||
also has the effect of whitelisting them as safe extensions for the purpose of RFD
|
||||
attack detection (see <<mvc-ann-requestmapping-rfd>> for more detail).
|
||||
|
||||
The introduction of `ContentNegotiationManager` also enables selective suffix pattern
|
||||
matching for incoming requests. For more details, see its javadocs.
|
||||
|
||||
Below is an example of customizing content negotiation options through the MVC Java
|
||||
config:
|
||||
Below is an example of customizing content negotiation options through the MVC Java config:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0]
|
||||
[subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
@@ -34238,7 +34282,7 @@ config:
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void configureContentNegotiation(ContentNegotiationConfigurer configurer) {
|
||||
configurer.favorPathExtension(false).favorParameter(true);
|
||||
configurer.mediaType("json", MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
@@ -34253,8 +34297,6 @@ that in turn can be created with a `ContentNegotiationManagerFactoryBean`:
|
||||
<mvc:annotation-driven content-negotiation-manager="contentNegotiationManager"/>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="contentNegotiationManager" class="org.springframework.web.accept.ContentNegotiationManagerFactoryBean">
|
||||
<property name="favorPathExtension" value="false"/>
|
||||
<property name="favorParameter" value="true"/>
|
||||
<property name="mediaTypes" >
|
||||
<value>
|
||||
json=application/json
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user