Polishing
This commit is contained in:
@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ The variants that Spring provides are as follows:
|
||||
`ConcurrentTaskExecutor` directly. However, if the `ThreadPoolTaskExecutor` is not
|
||||
flexible enough for your needs, `ConcurrentTaskExecutor` is an alternative.
|
||||
* `ThreadPoolTaskExecutor`:
|
||||
This implementation is most commonly used. It exposes bean properties for
|
||||
configuring a `java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor` and wraps it in a `TaskExecutor`.
|
||||
If you need to adapt to a different kind of `java.util.concurrent.Executor`, we
|
||||
recommend that you use a `ConcurrentTaskExecutor` instead.
|
||||
This implementation is most commonly used. It exposes bean properties for configuring
|
||||
a `java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor` and wraps it in a `TaskExecutor`.
|
||||
If you need to adapt to a different kind of `java.util.concurrent.Executor`,
|
||||
we recommend that you use a `ConcurrentTaskExecutor` instead.
|
||||
* `DefaultManagedTaskExecutor`:
|
||||
This implementation uses a JNDI-obtained `ManagedExecutorService` in a JSR-236
|
||||
compatible runtime environment (such as a Jakarta EE application server),
|
||||
@@ -75,9 +75,9 @@ The variants that Spring provides are as follows:
|
||||
[[scheduling-task-executor-usage]]
|
||||
=== Using a `TaskExecutor`
|
||||
|
||||
Spring's `TaskExecutor` implementations are used as simple JavaBeans. In the following example,
|
||||
we define a bean that uses the `ThreadPoolTaskExecutor` to asynchronously print
|
||||
out a set of messages:
|
||||
Spring's `TaskExecutor` implementations are commonly used with dependency injection.
|
||||
In the following example, we define a bean that uses the `ThreadPoolTaskExecutor`
|
||||
to asynchronously print out a set of messages:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0,subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ fixed delay, those methods should be used directly whenever possible. The value
|
||||
`PeriodicTrigger` implementation is that you can use it within components that rely on
|
||||
the `Trigger` abstraction. For example, it may be convenient to allow periodic triggers,
|
||||
cron-based triggers, and even custom trigger implementations to be used interchangeably.
|
||||
Such a component could take advantage of dependency injection so that you can configure such `Triggers`
|
||||
externally and, therefore, easily modify or extend them.
|
||||
Such a component could take advantage of dependency injection so that you can configure
|
||||
such `Triggers` externally and, therefore, easily modify or extend them.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[scheduling-task-scheduler-implementations]]
|
||||
@@ -238,10 +238,8 @@ As with Spring's `TaskExecutor` abstraction, the primary benefit of the `TaskSch
|
||||
arrangement is that an application's scheduling needs are decoupled from the deployment
|
||||
environment. This abstraction level is particularly relevant when deploying to an
|
||||
application server environment where threads should not be created directly by the
|
||||
application itself. For such scenarios, Spring provides a `TimerManagerTaskScheduler`
|
||||
that delegates to a CommonJ `TimerManager` on WebLogic or WebSphere as well as a more recent
|
||||
`DefaultManagedTaskScheduler` that delegates to a JSR-236 `ManagedScheduledExecutorService`
|
||||
in a Jakarta EE environment. Both are typically configured with a JNDI lookup.
|
||||
application itself. For such scenarios, Spring provides a `DefaultManagedTaskScheduler`
|
||||
that delegates to a JSR-236 `ManagedScheduledExecutorService` in a Jakarta EE environment.
|
||||
|
||||
Whenever external thread management is not a requirement, a simpler alternative is
|
||||
a local `ScheduledExecutorService` setup within the application, which can be adapted
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user