XhrTransport implementations do not need to redeclare interface when extending from AbstractXhrTransport

This commit is contained in:
Juergen Hoeller
2015-09-21 20:48:29 +02:00
parent fbce18418a
commit df0b26f0e6
3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ import org.springframework.web.socket.sockjs.frame.SockJsFrame;
* @author Rossen Stoyanchev
* @since 4.1
*/
public class JettyXhrTransport extends AbstractXhrTransport implements XhrTransport, Lifecycle {
public class JettyXhrTransport extends AbstractXhrTransport implements Lifecycle {
private final HttpClient httpClient;

View File

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ import org.springframework.web.socket.sockjs.frame.SockJsFrame;
* @author Rossen Stoyanchev
* @since 4.1
*/
public class RestTemplateXhrTransport extends AbstractXhrTransport implements XhrTransport {
public class RestTemplateXhrTransport extends AbstractXhrTransport {
private final RestOperations restTemplate;

View File

@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ import org.springframework.web.socket.sockjs.frame.SockJsFrame;
* @since 4.1.2
* @see org.xnio.Options
*/
public class UndertowXhrTransport extends AbstractXhrTransport implements XhrTransport {
public class UndertowXhrTransport extends AbstractXhrTransport {
private static final AttachmentKey<String> RESPONSE_BODY = AttachmentKey.create(String.class);