Prior to this change, to specify two or more annotation include/exclude
filters, one would declare @ComponentScan as follows:
@ComponentScan(basePackages="example.scannable",
useDefaultFilters=false,
includeFilters={
@Filter(MyStereotype.class),
@Filter(MyComponent.class)
})
This was because @Filter's 'value' attribute accepted exactly one
argument.
Now, any given @Filter may accept one or more value arguments, allowing
for more concise @ComponentScan declarations:
@ComponentScan(basePackages="example.scannable",
useDefaultFilters=false,
includeFilters=@Filter({MyStereotype.class, MyComponent.class}))
Supplying multiple arguments in this way assumes that they are the same
type of filter, e.g. ANNOTATION, ASSIGNABLE_TYPE, or CUSTOM. To declare
multiple *different* types of filters, multiple @Filter annotations are
still required, e.g.:
@ComponentScan(
includeFilters={
@Filter(type=ANNOTATION, value=MyStereotype.class),
@Filter(type=ASSIGNABLE_TYPE, value={Foo.class, Bar.class})
})
Note that specifying zero arguments, e.g. @Filter({}) is nonsensical; it
will have no effect on component scanning, but does not raise an error.
Issue: SPR-8881
Prior to this change, a @Configuration classes that @ComponentScan
themselves would result in a ConflictingBeanDefinitionException.
For example:
package com.foo.config;
@Configuration
@ComponentScan("com.foo");
public class AppConfig {
// ...
}
This resulted in a ConflictingBeanDefinitionException that users have
typically worked around in the following fashion:
package com.foo.config;
@Configuration
@ComponentScan(basePackages="com.foo",
excludeFilters=@Filter(value=ANNOTATION_TYPE, type=Configuration.class);
public class AppConfig {
// ...
}
This is obviously more verbose and cumbersome than would be desirable,
and furthermore potentially too constraining as it prohibits the ability
to include other legitimate @Configuration classes via scanning.
The exception was being thrown because of a logic problem in
ClassPathBeanDefinitionScanner. The bean definition for AppConfig gets
registered once by the user (e.g. when constructing an
AnnotationConfigApplicationContext), then again when performing the
component scan for 'com.foo'. Prior to this change,
ClassPathBeanDefinitionScanner's #isCompatible returned false if the new
bean definition was anything other than an AnnotatedBeanDefinition. The
intention of this check is really to see whether the new bean definition
is a *scanned* bean definition, i.e. the result of a component-scanning
operation. If so, then it becomes safe to assume that the original bean
definition is the one that should be kept, as it is the one explicitly
registered by the user.
Therefore, the fix is as simple as narrowing the instanceof check from
AnnotatedBeanDefinition to its ScannedGenericBeanDefinition subtype.
Note that this commit partially reverts changes introduced in SPR-8307
that explicitly caught ConflictingBeanDefinitionExceptions when
processing recursive @ComponentScan definitions, and rethrew as a
"CircularComponentScanException. With the changes in this commit,
such CBDEs will no longer occur, obviating the need for this check and
for this custom exception type altogether.
Issue: SPR-8808, SPR-8307
3.1 M2 introduced a regression that causes false positives during
@Configuration class candidate checks. Now performing a call to
AnnotationMetadata#isInterface in addition to checks for @Component and
@Bean annotations when determining whether a candidate is a 'lite'
configuration class. Annotations are in the end interfaces, so both
are filtered out at once.
Issue: SPR-8761
Allowing beans of primitive type to be looked up via getBean(Class), or
to be injected using @Autowired or @Injected or @Resource. Prior to
these changes, an attempt to lookup or inject a bean of, for example,
type boolean would fail because all spring beans are Objects, regardless
of initial type due to the way that ObjectFactory works.
Now these attempts to lookup or inject primitive types work, thanks to
simple changes in AbstractBeanFactory using ClassUtils#isAssignable
methods instead of the built-in Class#isAssignableFrom. The former takes
into account primitives and their object wrapper types, whereas the
latter does not.
The need to declare, look up or inject primitive-typed beans is probably
low -- how often does one need a bean of type boolean or int after all?.
Prior to the introduction of @Bean methods in Spring 3.0, it was not
possible in practice to register primitive beans, so this issue never
came up. Now that one can declare primitive-typed beans, it does make
sense that we properly support by-type lookup and injection without
forcing the user to work with object wrappers.
Issue: SPR-8874
The registration of more than one ConfigurationClassPostProcessor
results in the double-enhancement of @Configuration classes, i.e. a
two-deep CGLIB subclass hierarchy is created.
As a side-effect of changes introduced in 3.1 M2 fixing SPR-8080, this
behavior now results in an infinite loop at CGLIB callback processing
time, leading to a StackOverflowException which is then suppressed by
the container, and ultimately results in the user being presented with
an unintuitive "Bean 'x' is not already in creation" exception.
This fix introduces a marker interface 'EnhancedConfiguration' to be
implemented by all generated @Configuration subclasses. The
configuration class enhancer can then behave in an idempotent fashion
by checking to see whether a candidate @Configuration class is already
assignable to this type i.e. already enhanced and ignore it if so.
Naturally, users should avoid registering more than one
ConfigurationClassPostProcessor, but this is not always possible. As
with the case in point, SPR-8824 originates from problems with
spring-data-neo4j, which explicitly registers its own
ConfigurationClassPostProcessor. The user has little control over this
arrangement, so it is important that the framework is defensive as
described above.
Issue: SPR-8824
Also eliminate all 'cache definition' language in favor of
'cache operation' in comments, method and parameter names (most
classes had already been refactored to this effect).
Refactored getConfig => getApplicationContext such that subclasses have
control over the type of ApplicationContext used by the base class
tests. Done in anticipation of @EnableCaching tests that will favor use
of AnnotationConfigApplicationContext
Also updated all use of ClassPathXmlApplictionContext to
GenericXmlApplicationContext, which is generally preferred.
Anywhere the value of a destroy method may be expressed, specifying
the value "(inferred)" now indicates that the container should attempt
to automatically discover a destroy method. This functionality is
currently limited to detecting public, no-arg methods named 'close';
this is particularly useful for commonly used types such as Hibernate
SessionFactory most JDBC DataSource implementations, JMS connection
factories, and so forth.
This special value is captured as the constant
AbstractBeanDefinition#INFER_METHOD, which in turn serves as the default
value of the @Bean#destroyMethod attribute.
For example in the following case
@Bean
public BasicDataSource dataSource() { ... }
the container will automatically detect BasicDataSource#close and invoke
it when the enclosing ApplicationContext is closed. This is exactly
equivalent to
@Bean(destroyMethod="(inferred)")
public BasicDataSource dataSource() { ... }
A user may override this inference-by-default convention simply by
specifying a different method
@Bean(destroyMethod="myClose")
public MyBasicDataSource dataSource() { ... }
or, in the case of a bean that has an otherwise inferrable 'close'
method, but the user wishes to disable handling it entirely, an empty
string may be specified
@Bean(destroyMethod="")
public MyBasicDataSource dataSource() { ... }
The special destroy method name "(inferred)" may also be specified in
an XML context, e.g.
<bean destroy-method="(inferred)">
or
<beans default-destroy-method="(inferred)">
Note that "(inferred)" is the default value for @Bean#destroyMethod,
but NOT for the destroy-method and default-destroy-method attributes
in the spring-beans XML schema.
The principal reason for introducing this feature is to avoid forcing
@Configuration class users to type destroyMethod="close" every time a
closeable bean is configured. This kind of boilerplate is easily
forgotten, and this simple convention means the right thing is done
by default, while allowing the user full control over customization or
disablement in special cases.
Issue: SPR-8751
Add BridgeMethodResolver#isJava6VisibilityBridgeMethodPair to
distinguish between (a) bridge methods introduced in Java 6 to
compensate for inheriting public methods from non-public superclasses
and (b) bridge methods that have existed since Java 5 to accommodate
return type covariance and generic parameters.
In the former case, annotations should be looked up from the original
bridged method (SPR-7900). In the latter, the annotation should be
looked up against the bridge method itself (SPR-8660).
As noted in the Javadoc for the new method, see
http://stas-blogspot.blogspot.com/2010/03/java-bridge-methods-explained.html
for a useful description of the various types of bridge methods, as
well as http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6342411, the bug fixed in
Java 6 resulting in the introduction of 'visibility bridge methods'.
Issue: SPR-8660, SPR-7900
Prior to this change, StandardServletEnvironment evaluated a
"jndiPropertySourceEnabled" flag to determine whether or not to add a
JndiPropertySource. Following the changes introduced in SPR-8490, there
is now no reason not to enable a JNDI property source by default. This
change eliminates the support for "jndiPropertySourceEnabled" and adds
a JndiPropertySource automatically.
Issue: SPR-8545, SPR-8490
A <scheduled:task> element declared within a
<beans default-lazy-init="true"> element represents a contradiction in
terms: such a task will never be executed.
For this reason, we now override any inherited lazy-init settings
when parsing <scheduled:task> elements, forcing lazy-init to false
for the underlying ScheduledTaskRegistrar bean.
Thanks to Mike Youngstrom for contributing an initial patch.
Issue: SPR-8498
