Using Consumer<ClientCodecConfigurer> instead of
Consumer<ExchangeStrategies> eliminates one level of nesting that is
also unnecessary since codecs are the only strategy at present.
Closes gh-24124
As a follow-up of gh-23961, this change provides a way for custom codecs
to align with the default codecs' behavior on common features like
buffer size limits and logging request details.
Closes gh-24118
Co-authored-by: Rossen Stoyanchev <rstoyanchev@pivotal.io>
Prior to this commit, developers could configure their WebClient to use
their custom `ExchangeStrategies`, by providing it in the
`WebClient.Builder` chain.
Once created, an `ExchangeStrategies` instance is not mutable, which
makes it hard for further customizations by other components. In the
case of the reported issue, other components would override the default
configuration for the codecs maxInMemorySize.
This commit makes the `ExchangeStrategies` mutable and uses that fact to
further customize them with a new `WebClient.Builder#exchangeStrategies`
`Consumer` variant. This commit is also deprecating those mutating
variants in favor of a new `WebClient.Builder#exchangeStrategies` that
takes a `ExchangeStrategies#Builder` directly and avoids mutation issues
altogether.
Closes gh-23961
Prior to this commit, developers could configure their WebClient to use
their custom `ExchangeStrategies`, by providing it in the
`WebClient.Builder` chain.
Once created, an `ExchangeStrategies` instance is not mutable, which
makes it hard for further customizations by other components. In the
case of the reported issue, other components would override the default
configuration for the codecs maxInMemorySize.
This commit makes the `ExchangeStrategies` mutable and uses that fact to
further customize them with a new `WebClient.Builder#exchangeStrategies`
`Consumer` variant. This commit is also deprecating those mutating
variants in favor of a new `WebClient.Builder#exchangeStrategies` that
takes a `ExchangeStrategies#Builder` directly and avoids mutation issues
altogether.
Closes gh-23961
Before this change an @MessageMapping could be matched to any RSocket
interaction type, which is arguably too flexible, makes it difficult to
reason what would happen in case of a significant mismatch of
cardinality, e.g. request for Fire-And-Forget (1-to-0) mapped to a
method that returns Flux, and could result in payloads being ignored,
or not seen unintentionally.
This commit checks @ConnectMapping method on startup and rejects them
if they return any values (sync or async). It also refines each
@MessageMapping to match only the RSocket interaction type it fits
based on the input and output cardinality of the handler method.
Subsequently if a request is not matched, we'll do a second search to
identify partial matches (by route only) and raise a helpful error that
explains which interaction type is actually supported.
The reference docs has been updated to explain the options.
Closes gh-23999
