SEC-2151: AnnotationParameterNameDiscoverer support single annotated param
This makes sense since often times only a single argument is necessary in the expression.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ public class AnnotationParameterNameDiscovererTests {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void getParameterNamesInterfaceSingleParamAnnotatedWithMultiParams() {
|
||||
assertThat(discoverer.getParameterNames(ReflectionUtils.findMethod(Dao.class, "findMessageByToAndFrom", String.class, String.class))).isNull();
|
||||
assertThat(discoverer.getParameterNames(ReflectionUtils.findMethod(Dao.class, "findMessageByToAndFrom", String.class, String.class))).isEqualTo(new String [] { "to", null});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ public class AnnotationParameterNameDiscovererTests {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void getParameterNamesClassSingleParamAnnotatedWithMultiParams() {
|
||||
assertThat(discoverer.getParameterNames(ReflectionUtils.findMethod(Dao.class, "findMessageByToAndFrom", String.class, String.class))).isNull();
|
||||
assertThat(discoverer.getParameterNames(ReflectionUtils.findMethod(Dao.class, "findMessageByToAndFrom", String.class, String.class))).isEqualTo(new String [] { "to", null});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ public class AnnotationParameterNameDiscovererTests {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void getParameterNamesClassAnnotationOnImpl() throws Exception {
|
||||
assertThat(discoverer.getParameterNames(ReflectionUtils.findMethod(Dao.class, "findMessageByToAndFrom", String.class, String.class))).isNull();
|
||||
assertThat(discoverer.getParameterNames(ReflectionUtils.findMethod(Dao.class, "findMessageByToAndFrom", String.class, String.class))).isEqualTo(new String [] { "to", null});
|
||||
assertThat(discoverer.getParameterNames(ReflectionUtils.findMethod(DaoImpl.class, "findMessageByToAndFrom", String.class, String.class))).isEqualTo(new String[] {"to", "from"});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user