From 74b0c1780e2d99e8623f025b22d8f2a5fff01815 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luke Taylor <luke.taylor@springsource.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:25:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] SEC-1707: Added metadata-source-ref attribute to namespace
 appendix.

---
 docs/manual/src/docbook/appendix-namespace.xml | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/manual/src/docbook/appendix-namespace.xml b/docs/manual/src/docbook/appendix-namespace.xml
index 7aca76ccfe..b3d8040038 100644
--- a/docs/manual/src/docbook/appendix-namespace.xml
+++ b/docs/manual/src/docbook/appendix-namespace.xml
@@ -634,6 +634,13 @@
                     you do this if you are using a custom implementation and want to use these
                     annotations. </para>
             </section>
+            <section xml:id="nsa-custom-metadata-source">
+                <title>The <literal>&lt;metadata-source-ref&gt;</literal> Attribute</title>
+                <para> An external <interfacename>MethodSecurityMetadataSource</interfacename>
+                    instance can be supplied which will take priority over other sources
+                    (such as the default annotations).
+                </para>
+            </section>
             <section xml:id="nsa-gms-mode">
                 <title>The <literal>mode</literal> Attribute</title>
                 <para>This attribute can be set to <quote>aspectj</quote> to specify that AspectJ
@@ -641,7 +648,7 @@
                     with the <classname>AnnotationSecurityAspect</classname> from the
                     <literal>spring-security-aspects</literal> module. </para>
             </section>
-            <section>
+            <section xml:id="nsa-protect-pointcut">
                 <title>Securing Methods using <literal>&lt;protect-pointcut&gt;</literal></title>
                 <para> Rather than defining security attributes on an individual method or class
                     basis using the <literal>@Secured</literal> annotation, you can define