Fix alias handling with @Command annotation
- Revisit how alias commands are added using @Command annotation when using if/or on class and/or method level. - With this change alias handling is more logical and there's better tests and docs. - Fixes #945
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright 2023 the original author or authors.
|
||||
* Copyright 2023-2024 the original author or authors.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
||||
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
||||
@@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ public class AliasCommands {
|
||||
public String testAlias2Annotation() {
|
||||
return "Hello from alias command";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Command(command = "alias-3 alias-31", alias = "alias-32 alias-33")
|
||||
public String testAlias3Annotation() {
|
||||
return "Hello from alias3 command";
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Component
|
||||
@@ -89,6 +94,22 @@ public class AliasCommands {
|
||||
.and()
|
||||
.build();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Bean
|
||||
public CommandRegistration testAlias3Registration(CommandRegistration.BuilderSupplier builder) {
|
||||
return builder.get()
|
||||
.command(REG, "alias-3 alias-31")
|
||||
.group(GROUP)
|
||||
.withAlias()
|
||||
.command(REG, "alias-32 alias-33")
|
||||
.and()
|
||||
.withTarget()
|
||||
.function(ctx -> {
|
||||
return "Hello from alias3 command";
|
||||
})
|
||||
.and()
|
||||
.build();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user