From bcb5a8d2a70727a0c0388fbab19bdcc6c9ec9ee5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phillip Webb <pwebb@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:48:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Revert use of putAll for JSF spec compliance

Issues: SWF-1532
---
 .../main/java/org/springframework/faces/mvc/JsfView.java    | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/spring-faces/src/main/java/org/springframework/faces/mvc/JsfView.java b/spring-faces/src/main/java/org/springframework/faces/mvc/JsfView.java
index 70906ce7..debe4fe7 100644
--- a/spring-faces/src/main/java/org/springframework/faces/mvc/JsfView.java
+++ b/spring-faces/src/main/java/org/springframework/faces/mvc/JsfView.java
@@ -88,7 +88,11 @@ public class JsfView extends AbstractUrlBasedView {
 	}
 
 	private void populateRequestMap(FacesContext facesContext, Map<String, Object> model) {
-		facesContext.getExternalContext().getRequestMap().putAll(model);
+		Map<String, Object> requestMap = facesContext.getExternalContext().getRequestMap();
+		for (Map.Entry<String, Object> entry : model.entrySet()) {
+			// JSF does not insist that putAll is implemented, hence we use individual put calls
+			requestMap.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
+		}
 	}
 
 	private Lifecycle createFacesLifecycle() {