JSF Integration Introduction Spring Faces is Spring's JSF integration module that simplifies using JSF with Spring. It lets you use the JSF UI Component Model with Spring MVC and Spring Web Flow controllers. Spring Faces also includes a small Facelets component library that provides Ajax and client-side validation capabilities. This component library builds on Spring Javascript, a Javascript abstraction framework that integrates Dojo as the underlying UI toolkit. Spring-centric Integration Approach Spring Faces combines the strengths of JSF, its UI component model, with the strengths of Spring, its controller and configuration model. This brings you all the strengths of JSF without any of the weaknesses. Spring Faces provides a powerful supplement to a number of the standard JSF facilities, including: managed bean facility scope management event handling navigation rules easy modularization and packaging of views cleaner URLs model-level validation client-side validation and UI enhancement Ajax partial page updates and full navigation progressive enhancement and graceful degradation Using these features will significantly reduce the amount of configuration required in faces-config.xml while providing a cleaner separation between the view and controller layer and better modularization of your application's functional responsibilities. These use of these features are outlined in the sections to follow. As the majority of these features build on the flow definition language of Spring Web Flow, it is assumed that you have an understanding of the foundations presented in Defining Flows . Configuring web.xml The first step to using Spring Faces is to route requests to the DispatcherServlet in the web.xml file. In this example, we map all URLs that begin with /spring/ to the servlet. The servlet needs to be configured. An init-param is used in the servlet to pass the contextConfigLocation . This is the location of the Spring configuration for your application. Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet contextConfigLocation /WEB-INF/web-application-config.xml 1 Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet /spring/* ]]> In order for JSF to bootstrap correctly, the FacesServlet must be configured in web.xml as it normally would even though you generally will not need to route requests through it at all when using Spring Faces. Faces Servlet javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet 1 Faces Servlet *.faces ]]> When using the Spring Faces components, you also need to configure the Spring JavaScript ResourceServlet so that CSS and JavaScript resources may be output correctly by the components. This servlet must be mapped to /resources/* in order for the URL's rendered by the components to function correctly. Resource Servlet org.springframework.js.resource.ResourceServlet 0 Resources Servlet /resources/* ]]> The Spring Faces components require the use of Facelets instead of JSP, so the typical Facelets configuration must be added as well when using these components. javax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX .xhtml ]]> Configuring Web Flow to render JSF views The next step is to configure Web Flow to render JSF views. To do this, in your Spring Web Flow configuration include the faces namespace and link in the faces flow-builder-services : ]]> The faces:flow-builder-services tag also several other defaults appropriate for a JSF environment. Specifically, the Unified EL is configured as the default Expression Language. See the swf-booking-faces reference application in the distribution for a complete working example. Configuring faces-config.xml The only configuration needed in faces-config.xml is specific to the use of Facelets. If you are using JSP and not using the Spring Faces components, you do not need to add anything specific to Spring Faces to your faces-config.xml com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler ]]> Replacing the JSF Managed Bean Facility Spring Faces allows you to completely replace the JSF managed bean facility with a combination of flow-managed variables and Spring managed beans. It gives you a good deal more control over the lifecycle of your managed objects with well-defined hooks for initialization and execution of your domain model. Additionally, since you are presumably already using Spring for your business layer, it reduces the conceptual overhead of having to maintain two different managed bean models. In doing pure JSF development, you will quickly find that request scope is not long-lived enough for storing conversational model objects that drive complex event-driven views. The only available option is to begin putting things into session scope, with the extra burden of needing to clean the objects up before progressing to another view or functional area of the application. What is really needed is a managed scope that is somewhere between request and session scope. Fortunately web flow provides such extended facilities. Using Flow Variables The easiest and most natural way to declare and manage the model is through the use of flow variables . You can declare these variables at the beginning of the flow: ]]> and then reference this variable in one of the flow's JSF view templates through EL: ]]> Note that you do not need to prefix the variable with its scope when referencing it from the template (though you can do so if you need to be more specific). As with standard JSF beans, all available scopes will be searched for a matching variable, so you could change the scope of the variable in your flow definition without having to modify the EL expressions that reference it. You can also define view instance variables that are scoped to the current view and get cleaned up automatically upon transitioning to another view. This is quite useful with JSF as views are often constructed to handle multiple in-page events across many requests before transitioning to another view. To define a view instance variable, you can use the var element inside a view-state definition: ]]> Using Scoped Spring Beans Though defining autowired flow instance variables provides nice modularization and readability, occasions may arise where you want to utilize the other capabilities of the Spring container such as AOP. In these cases, you can define a bean in your Spring ApplicationContext and give it a specific web flow scope: ]]> The major difference with this approach is that the bean will not be fully initialized until it is first accessed via an EL expression. This sort of lazy instantiation via EL is quite similar to how JSF managed beans are typically allocated. Manipulating The Model The need to initialize the model before view rendering (such as by loading persistent entities from a database) is quite common, but JSF by itself does not provide any convenient hooks for such initialization. The flow definition language provides a natural facility for this through its Actions . Spring Faces provides some extra conveniences for converting the outcome of an action into a JSF-specific data structure. For example: ]]> This will take the result of the bookingService.findBookings method an wrap it in a custom JSF DataModel so that the list can be used in a standard JSF DataTable component: 0}"> Name #{booking.hotel.name} Confirmation number #{booking.id} Action ]]> The custom DataModel provides some extra conveniences such as being serializable for storage beyond request scope and access to the currently selected row in EL expressions. For example, on postback from a view where the action event was fired by a component within a DataTable, you can take action on the selected row's model instance: ]]> Handling JSF Events With Spring Web Flow Spring Web Flow allows you to handle JSF action events in a decoupled way, requiring no direct dependencies in your Java code on JSF API's. In fact, these events can often be handled completely in the flow definiton language without requiring any custom Java action code at all. This allows for a more agile development process since the artifacts being manipulated in wiring up events (JSF view templates and SWF flow definitions) are instantly refreshable without requiring a build and re-deploy of the whole application. Handling JSF In-page Action Events A simple but common case in JSF is the need to signal an event that causes manipulation of the model in some way and then redisplays the same view to reflect the changed state of the model. The flow definition language has special support for this in the transition element. A good example of this is a table of paged list results. Suppose you want to be able to load and display only a portion of a large result list, and allow the user to page through the results. The initial view-state definition to load and display the list would be: ]]> You construct a JSF DataTable that displays the current hotels list, and then place a "More Results" link below the table: ]]> This commandLink signals a "next" event from its action attribute. You can then handle the event by adding to the view-state definition: ]]> Here you handle the "next" event by incrementing the page count on the searchCriteria instance. The on-render action is then called again with the updated criteria, which causes the next page of results to be loaded into the DataModel. The same view is re-rendered since there was no to attribute on the transition element, and the changes in the model are reflected in the view. Handling JSF Action Events The next logical level beyond in-page events are events that require navigation to another view, with some manipulation of the model along the way. Achieving this with pure JSF would require adding a navigation rule to faces-config.xml and likely some intermediary Java code in a JSF managed bean (both tasks requiring a re-deploy). With the flow defintion language, you can handle such a case concisely in one place in a quite similar way to how in-page events are handled. Continuing on with our use case of manipulating a paged list of results, suppose we want each row in the displayed DataTable to contain a link to a detail page for that row instance. You can add a column to the table containing the following commandLink component: ]]> This raises the "select" event which you can then handle by adding another transition element to the existing view-state : ]]> Here the "select" event is handled by pushing the currently selected hotel instance from the DataTable into flow scope, so that it may be referenced by the "reviewHotel" view-state . Performing Model Validation JSF provides useful facilities for validating input at field-level before changes are applied to the model, but when you need to then perform more complex validation at the model-level after the updates have been applied, you are generally left with having to add more custom code to your JSF action methods in the managed bean. Validation of this sort is something that is generally a responsibility of the domain model itself, but it is difficult to get any error messages propagated back to the view without introducing an undesirable dependency on the JSF API in your domain layer. With Spring Faces, you can utilize the generic and low-level MessageContext in your business code and any messages added there will then be available to the FacesContext at render time. For example, suppose you have a view where the user enters the necessary details to complete a hotel booking, and you need to ensure the Check In and Check Out dates adhere to a given set of business rules. You can invoke such model-level validation from a transition element: ]]> Here the "proceed" event is handled by invoking a model-level validation method on the booking instance, passing the generic MessageContext instance so that messages may be recorded. The messages can then be displayed along with any other JSF messages with the h:messages component, Handling Ajax Events Spring Faces provides some special UICommand components that go beyond the standard JSF components by adding the ability to do Ajax-based partial view updates. These components degrade gracefully so that the flow will still be fully functional by falling back to full page refreshes if a user with a less capable browser views the page. Revisiting the earlier example with the paged table, you can change the "More Results" link to use an Ajax request by replacing the standard commandButton with the Spring Faces version (note that the Spring Faces command components use Ajax by default, but they can alternately be forced to use a normal form submit by setting ajaxEnabled="false" on the component): ]]> This event is handled just as in the non-Ajax case with the transition element, but now you will add a special render action that specifies which portions of the component tree need to be re-rendered: ]]> The fragments="hotels:searchResultsFragment" is an instruction that will be interpreted at render time, such that only the component with the JSF clientId "hotels:searchResultsFragment" will be rendered and returned to the client. This fragment will then be automatically replaced in the page. The fragments attribute can be a comma-delimited list of ids, with each id representing the root node of a subtree (meaning the root node and all of its children) to be rendered. If the "next" event is fired in a non-Ajax request (i.e., if JavaScript is disabled on the client), the render action will be ignored and the full page will be rendered as normal. In addition to the Spring Faces commandLink component, there is a corresponding commandButton component with the same functionality. There is also a special ajaxEvent component that will raise a JSF action even in response to any client-side DOM event. See the Spring Faces tag library docs for full details. An additional built-in feature when using the Spring Faces Ajax components is the ability to have the response rendered inside a rich modal popup widget by setting popup="true" on a view-state . ]]> If the "changeSearchCriteria" view-state is reached as the result of an Ajax-request, the result will be rendered into a rich popup. If JavaScript is unavailable, the request will be processed with a full browser refresh, and the "changeSearchCriteria" view will be rendered as normal. Enhancing The User Experience With Rich Web Forms JSF and Web Flow combine to provide and extensive server-side validation model for your web application, but excessive roundtrips to the server to execute this validation and return error messages can be a tedious experience for your users. Spring Faces provides a number of client-side rich validation controls that can enhance the user experience by applying simple validations that give immediate feedback. Some simple examples are illustrated below. See the Spring Faces taglib docs for a complete tag reference. Validating a Text Field Simple client-side text validation can be applied with the clientTextValidator component: ]]> This will apply client-side required validation to the child inputText component, giving the user a clear indicator if the field is left blank. Validating a Numeric Field Simple client-side numeric validation can be applied with the clientNumberValidator component: ]]> This will apply client-side validation to the child inputText component, giving the user a clear indicator if the field is left blank, is not numeric, or does not match the given regular expression. Validating a Date Field Simple client-side date validation with a rich calendar popup can be applied with the clientDateValidator component: ]]> This will apply client-side validation to the child inputText component, giving the user a clear indicator if the field is left blank or is not a valid date. Preventing an Invalid Form Submission The validateAllOnClick component can be used to intercept the "onclick" event of a child component and suppress the event if all client-side validations do not pass.   ]]> This will prevent the form from being submitted when the user clicks the "proceed" button if the form is invalid. When the validations are executed, the user is given clear and immediate indicators of the problems that need to be corrected. Third-Party Component Library Integration Spring Faces strives to be compatible with any third-party JSF component library. By honoring all of the standard semantics of the JSF specification within the SWF-driven JSF lifecycle, third-party libraries in general should "just work". The main thing to remember is that configuration in web.xml will change slightly since Spring Faces requests are not routed through the standard FacesServlet. Typically, anything that is traditionally mapped to the FacesServlet should be mapped to the Spring DispatcherServlet instead. (You can also map to both if for example you are migrating a legacy JSF application page-by-page.) In some cases, a deeper level of integration can be achieved by configuring special flow services that are "aware" of a particular component library, and these will be noted in the examples to follow. Rich Faces Integration To use the Rich Faces component library with Spring Faces, the following filter configuration is needed in web.xml (in addition to the typical Spring Faces configuration): RichFaces Filter richfaces org.ajax4jsf.Filter richfaces Spring Web MVC Dispatcher Servlet REQUEST FORWARD INCLUDE ]]> For deeper integration (including the ability to have a view with combined use of the Spring Faces Ajax components and Rich Faces Ajax components), configure the RichFacesAjaxHandler on your FlowController: ]]> RichFaces Ajax components can be used in conjunction with the render tag to render partial fragments on an Ajax request. Instead of embedding the ids of the components to be re-rendered directly in the view template (as you traditionally do with Rich Faces), you can bind the reRender attribute of a RichFaces Ajax component to a special flowRenderFragments EL variable. For example, in your view template you can have a fragment that you would potentially like to re-render in response to a particular event: Name #{hotel.name} Address #{hotel.address} ]]> then a RichFaces Ajax commandLink to fire the event: ]]> and then in your flow definition a transition to handle the event: ]]> Apache MyFaces Trinidad Integration The Apache MyFaces Trinidad library has been tested with the Spring Faces integration and proven to fit in nicely. Deeper integration to allow the Trinidad components and Spring Faces components to play well together has not yet been attempted, but Trinidad provides a pretty thorough solution on its own when used in conjunction with the Spring Faces integration layer. Typical Trinidad + Spring Faces configuration is as follows in web.xml (in addition to the typical Spring Faces configuration): javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD server org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CHANGE_PERSISTENCE session org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.ENABLE_QUIRKS_MODE false Trinidad Filter org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter Trinidad Filter Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet Trinidad Resource Servlet org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.ResourceServlet resources /adf/* ]]>