Simplified support for implicit functions in composition
added test for namless Supplier | Function
This commit is contained in:
@@ -103,6 +103,24 @@ public class InMemoryFunctionCatalogTests {
|
||||
assertThat(lookedUpFunction.get().blockFirst()).isEqualTo("olleh");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFunctionCompletelyImplicitComposition() {
|
||||
FunctionRegistration<Words> wordsRegistration = new FunctionRegistration<>(
|
||||
new Words(), "words").type(FunctionType.of(Words.class));
|
||||
FunctionRegistration<Reverse> reverseRegistration = new FunctionRegistration<>(
|
||||
new Reverse(), "reverse").type(FunctionType.of(Reverse.class));
|
||||
InMemoryFunctionCatalog catalog = new InMemoryFunctionCatalog();
|
||||
catalog.register(wordsRegistration);
|
||||
catalog.register(reverseRegistration);
|
||||
|
||||
// There's only one function, we should be able to leave that blank
|
||||
Supplier<Flux<String>> lookedUpFunction = catalog.lookup("|");
|
||||
assertThat(catalog.getFunctionType("|").isMessage()).isFalse();
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(lookedUpFunction).isNotNull();
|
||||
assertThat(lookedUpFunction.get().blockFirst()).isEqualTo("olleh");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFunctionCompositionExplicit() {
|
||||
FunctionRegistration<Words> wordsRegistration = new FunctionRegistration<>(
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user