If there is only one function you shouldn't have to set any configuration
to get a stream app to run. This also implementation supports multiple
functions, trying to guess which one to use based on the type of
the incoming message payload. In principle that could be strategized
as a simple router function (e.g. to look for a header with a function
name).
If there are functions and consumers in the same app, they will
subscribe to the same input channel (and hence by default Spring
Integration will load balance between them). This could also probably
use some more features, to specify the desired behaviour.
If user *does* supply spring.cloud.function.stream.endpoint then it
is used and overrides all other possible routes.
- use ProxyWrapper around a FluxConsumer as well
making it consistent with the behaviour of Flux
functions
- Enable introspection for scanned beans
- Fix failing tests by passing JSON string as input messages
(marshalled form expected from the binder)
Should be easy enoug hto add back later, but it was causing issues
with type conversion where we are npot yet sophisticated enough
to chain functions together and keep track of the types being
passed between them.
User can POST to web endpoint in SSE style, i.e:
HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: text/event-stream
data:foo
data:bar
Will be converted to a Flux with values foo and bar
Make it deployable via its maven coordinates in
spring-cloud-function-deployer (it is deployed by default on start
up right now, but that's just a demo)
