Refactor and simplify AWSLambdaUtils to work with AWS serialization libraries
Add support for API v2 gateway event
Resolves#709Resolves#684Resolves#641
Introduce auto-fallback to routing function if more then one function is present and no definition is provided.
Add explicit routing sample
Add documentation
This commit also includes other minor fixes around CustomRuntime which was getting in the way of this specific issue
Added lookup for _HANDLER env variable
Added few tests (will need more)
Added support for Iterable for reactive functions
Resolves#662
Prior to this it was based on existance of AWS_LAMBDA_RUNTIME_API env variable which turned out to be not very reliable since it is present in Java 11 runtime
With this commit it simple ensures that the handler is neither FunctionInvoker nor AbstractSpringFunctionAdapterInitializer
Resolves#673
This approach simplifies the existing request handlers while also fixing the invocation model to ensure AC is not created multiple times and ExecutionContext is properly propagated via Message headers
The old request handlers are deprecated
Documentation updates as well as tests
Resolves#437
I've faced the "The key must start with a letter and can only contain letters, numbers, and underscores." issue in the AWS lambda. So both _HANDLER and spring.cloud.function.definition were not enabled to be added as environment variables. Let me know your thoughts.
Ensured we have Custom Runtime examples for functional and '@Bean' style
Improve AWSLambdaUtils to ensure it works without APIGatewayProxyRequestEvent on classpath
This commit provides initial set of improvements to executing functions in AWS Custom Runtime
- Consistent invocation model for functional as well as @Bean configuration models via new CustomRuntimeEventLoop as well as AWSLambdaUtils
- Clean up classpath to decrease the size of the JAR/ZIP file
- Configuration simplification which no longer requires enabling of function exporter
It also allows user to define functions that rely on AWS types such as APIGatewayProxyRequestEvent
The existing invocation model remains in tact for the time being. Both invocation models are mutually exclusing in theit setup to avoid potential conflict.
Resolves#538Resolves#630
