tidy up some docos
This commit is contained in:
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
The framework is oriented around application developers not needing to know any details of the framework - there are a few application developer interfaces that can be used for convenient construction of data processing pipelines, but apart from that we support as close to a POJO programming model as is practical. This is similar to the approach taken in Spring Core in the area of DAO implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Spring Batch version 1.x was targeted at Java 1.4 and single-process, possibly multi-threaded execution. Spring Batch 2.0 will be a Java 5 only release, using all available language features with no compromises for backward compatibility with Java 2. We think this will provide a significantly improved programming model for batch application developers. Spring Batch 2.0 will also introduce new features enabling an application to scale to multiple processes.
|
||||
Spring Batch version 1.x was targeted at Java 1.4 and single-process, possibly multi-threaded execution. Spring Batch 2.0 is a Java 5 only release, using all available language features with no compromises for backward compatibility with Java 2. We think this will provide a significantly improved programming model for batch application developers.
|
||||
|
||||
Framework tools for scaling to multiple processes are being developed in a parallel project hosted inside Spring Batch. These will provide more advanced technical services and features to enable extremely high-volume and high performance batch jobs though proven optimization and clustering techniques. Proven scaling techniques will be provided as strategies allowing users to spread the load across a pool of clustered servers. There are also discussions to leverage grid technologies as a scaling solution. These features are targeted for Spring Batch version 2.0.
|
||||
Framework tools for scaling to multiple processes are available in Spring Batch 2.0. These provide advanced technical services and features to enable extremely high-volume and high performance batch jobs though proven optimization and clustering techniques. An SPI is provided with a simple implementation that works in a single process (multi-threaded). Various remoting and grid technologies can be used to implement the same SPI in a multi-process, clustered environment.
|
||||
|
||||
Matt Welsh's work shows that {{{http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~mdw/proj/seda/}SEDA}} has enormous benefits over more rigid processing architectures, and messaging environments give us a lot of resilience out of the box. So we also want to enable a more SEDA flavoured execution environments, as well as supporting the more traditional ETL style approach. The key to unlocking the programming model is {{{http://www.springframework.org/projects/spring-integration}Spring Integration}}, where the choice of transport and distribution strategy can be made as late as possible. The key to the runtime requirements of deployment and manageability is going to be with the {{{http://www.springsource.com/products/suite/applicationplatform}SpringSource Application Platform}}. The same application code could be used in principle for a standalone tool processing a small amount of data, and a massive enterprise-scale bulk-processing engine.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,656 +0,0 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
|
||||
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd">
|
||||
<chapter id="The Nature of Batch Applications">
|
||||
<title>The Nature of Batch Applications</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
<title id="s.0">Batch Application Overview</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The Application layer is anything built on top of the spring batch framework.
|
||||
Many enterprises solutions are composed of composite applications, meaning online web
|
||||
applications, SOA Enabled Services, Enterprise Application Integration, and Batch. Despite
|
||||
the ideal of zero latency applications and the interconnected enterprise many interfaces
|
||||
still define the exchange of information through flat files. Increasingly these files
|
||||
are provided in an XML format. The chapter will provide a more in depth coverage of
|
||||
batch solution space and the kinds of problems that spring batch may provide solutions
|
||||
for high volume processing.</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.1">Batch Processing Strategies</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>To help design and implement batch systems, basic batch
|
||||
application building blocks and patterns should be provided to the
|
||||
designers and programmers in form of sample structure charts and
|
||||
code shells. When starting to design a batch job, the business
|
||||
logic should be decomposed into a series of steps which can be
|
||||
implemented using the following standard building blocks:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Conversion Applications: For each type of file supplied
|
||||
by or generated to an external system, a conversion application
|
||||
will need to be created to convert the transaction records
|
||||
supplied into a standard format required for processing. This
|
||||
type of batch application can partly or entirely consist of
|
||||
translation utility modules (see Basic Batch Services).</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Validation Applications: Validation applications ensure
|
||||
that all input/output records are correct and consistent.
|
||||
Validation is typically based on file headers and trailers,
|
||||
checksums and validation algorithms as well as record level
|
||||
cross-checks.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Extract Applications: An application that reads a set of
|
||||
records from a database or input file, selects records based on
|
||||
predefined rules, and writes the records to an output
|
||||
file.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Extract/Update Applications: An application that reads
|
||||
records from a database or an input file, and makes changes to
|
||||
a database or an output file driven by the data found in each
|
||||
input record.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Processing and Updating Applications: An application that
|
||||
performs processing on input transactions from an extract or a
|
||||
validation application. The processing will usually involve
|
||||
reading a database to obtain data required for processing,
|
||||
potentially updating the database and creating records for
|
||||
output processing.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Output/Format Applications: Applications reading an input
|
||||
file, restructures data from this record according to a
|
||||
standard format, and produces an output file for printing or
|
||||
transmission to another program or system.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis role="bold">Pre-processing
|
||||
Capabilities</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Additionally a basic application shell should be provided for
|
||||
business logic that cannot be built using the previously mentioned
|
||||
building blocks.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In addition to the main building blocks, each application may
|
||||
use one or more of standard utility steps, such as:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Sort - A Program that reads an input file and produces an
|
||||
output file where records have been re-sequenced according to a
|
||||
sort key field in the records. Sorts are usually performed by
|
||||
standard system utilities.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Split - A program that reads a single input file, and
|
||||
writes each record to one of several output files based on a
|
||||
field value. Splits can be tailored or performed by
|
||||
parameter-driven standard system utilities.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Merge - A program that reads records from multiple input
|
||||
files and produces one output file with combined data from the
|
||||
input files. Merges can be tailored or performed by
|
||||
parameter-driven standard system utilities.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Batch applications can additionally be categorized by their
|
||||
input source:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Database-driven applications are driven by rows or values
|
||||
retrieved from the database.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>File-driven applications are driven by records or values
|
||||
retrieved from a file</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The foundation of any batch system is the processing
|
||||
strategy. Factors affecting the selection of the strategy include
|
||||
estimated batch system volume, concurrency with on-line or with
|
||||
another batch systems, available batch windows etc. Also with more
|
||||
enterprises wanting to be up and running 24x7, it is more challenging to
|
||||
establish batch windows.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Typical processing options for batch are:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Normal processing in a batch window during off-line</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Concurrent batch / on-line processing</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Parallel processing of many different batch runs or jobs
|
||||
at the same time</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Streaming i.e. processing of many instances of the same
|
||||
job at the same time</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>A combination of these</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The order in the list above reflects the implementation
|
||||
complexity, processing in a batch window being the easiest and
|
||||
streaming the most complex to implement.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Some or all of these options may be supported by a commercial
|
||||
scheduler.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In the following section these processing options will be
|
||||
discussed in more detail. It is important to notice that the commit
|
||||
and locking strategy adopted by batch processes will be dependent
|
||||
on the type of processing performed and as a rule of thumb, the
|
||||
on-line locking should use the same principles. Therefore a batch
|
||||
architecture cannot be simply an afterthought when designing an
|
||||
overall architecture.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The locking strategy can use only normal database locks, or
|
||||
an additional custom locking service can be implemented in the
|
||||
architecture. The locking service would track database locking (for
|
||||
example by storing the necessary information in a dedicated
|
||||
db-table) and give or deny permissions to the application programs
|
||||
requesting a db operation. Retry logic could also be implemented by
|
||||
this architecture to avoid aborting a batch job in case of a lock
|
||||
situation.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis role="bold">1. Normal processing in a batch
|
||||
window</emphasis> For simple batch processes running in a separate
|
||||
batch window, where the data being updated is not required by
|
||||
on-line users or other batch processes, concurrency is not an issue
|
||||
and a single commit can be done at the end of the batch run.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In most cases a more robust approach is more appropriate. A
|
||||
thing to keep in mind is that batch systems have a tendency to grow
|
||||
as time goes by, both in terms of complexity and the data volumes
|
||||
they will handle. If no locking strategy is in place and the system
|
||||
still relies on a single commit point, modifying the batch programs
|
||||
can be painful. Therefore, even with the simplest batch systems,
|
||||
consider the need for commit logic depicted in the
|
||||
[Restart/Recovery section|Restart & Recovery] as well as the
|
||||
information concerning the more complex cases below.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis role="bold">2. Concurrent batch / on-line
|
||||
processing</emphasis> Batch applications processing data that can
|
||||
simultaneously be updated by on-line users, should not lock any
|
||||
data (either in the database or in files) which could be required
|
||||
by on-line users for more than a few seconds. Also updates should
|
||||
be committed to the database at the end of every transaction or what's
|
||||
referred to as a commit interval of size=1. This minimizes the portion
|
||||
of data that is unavailable to other processes and the elapsed time the
|
||||
data is unavailable.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis role="bold">2. Concurrent batch / on-line
|
||||
processing</emphasis> Batch applications processing data that can
|
||||
simultaneously be updated by on-line users, should not lock any
|
||||
data (either in the database or in files) which could be required
|
||||
by on-line users for more than a few seconds. Also updates should
|
||||
be committed to the database at the end of every transaction or what's
|
||||
referred to as a commit interval of size=1. This minimizes the portion
|
||||
of data that is unavailable to other processes and the elapsed time the
|
||||
data is unavailable.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Another option to minimize physical locking is to have a
|
||||
logical row-level locking implemented using either an Optimistic
|
||||
Locking Pattern or a Pessimistic Locking Pattern.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Optimistic locking assumes a low likelihood of record
|
||||
contention. It typically means inserting a timestamp column in
|
||||
each database table used concurrently by both batch and on-line
|
||||
processing. When an application fetches a row for processing,
|
||||
it also fetches the timestamp. As the application then tries to
|
||||
update the processed row, the update uses the original
|
||||
timestamp in the WHERE clause. If the timestamp matches, the
|
||||
data and the timestamp will be updated successfully. If the
|
||||
timestamp does not match, this indicates that another
|
||||
application has updated the same row between the fetch and the
|
||||
update attempt and therefore the update cannot be
|
||||
performed.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Pessimistic locking is any locking strategy that assumes
|
||||
there is a high likelihood of record contention and therefore
|
||||
either a physical or logical lock needs to be obtained at
|
||||
retrieval time. One type of pessimistic logical locking uses a
|
||||
dedicated lock-column in the database table. When an
|
||||
application retrieves the row for update, it sets a flag in the
|
||||
lock column. With the flag in place, other applications
|
||||
attempting to retrieve the same row will logically fail. When
|
||||
the application that set the flag updates the row, it also
|
||||
clears the flag, enabling the row to be retrieved by other
|
||||
applications. Please note, that the integrity of data must be
|
||||
maintained also between the initial fetch and the setting of
|
||||
the flag, for example by using db locks (e.g.,SELECT FOR
|
||||
UPDATE). Note also that this method suffers from the same
|
||||
downside as physical locking except that it is somewhat easier
|
||||
to manage building a time-out mechanism that will get the lock
|
||||
released if the user goes to lunch while the record is
|
||||
locked.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>These patterns are not necessarily suitable for batch
|
||||
processing, but they might be used for concurrent batch and on-line
|
||||
processing for example in cases where the database doesn't
|
||||
support row-level locking. As a general rule, optimistic locking is
|
||||
more suitable for on-line applications, while pessimistic locking
|
||||
is more suitable for batch applications. Whenever logical locking
|
||||
is used, the same scheme must be used for all applications
|
||||
accessing data entities protected by logical locks.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Note that both of these solutions only address locking a
|
||||
single record. Often we may need to lock a logically related group
|
||||
of records. With physical locks, you have to manage these very
|
||||
carefully in order to avoid potential deadlocks. With logical
|
||||
locks, it is usually best to build a logical lock manager that
|
||||
understands the logical record groups you want to protect and can
|
||||
ensure that locks are coherent and non-deadlocking. This logical
|
||||
lock manager usually uses its own tables for lock management,
|
||||
contention reporting, time-out mechanism, etc.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis role="bold">3. Parallel Processing</emphasis>
|
||||
Parallel processing allows multiple batch runs / jobs to run in
|
||||
parallel to minimize the total elapsed batch processing time. This
|
||||
is not a problem as long as the jobs are not sharing the same
|
||||
files, db-tables or index spaces. If they do, this service should
|
||||
be implemented using partitioned data. Another option is to build
|
||||
an architecture module for maintaining interdependencies using a
|
||||
control table. A control table should contain a row for each shared
|
||||
resource and whether it is in use by an application or not. The
|
||||
batch architecture (Control Program Tasklet) or the application in a
|
||||
parallel job would then retrieve information from that table to
|
||||
determine if it can get access to the resource it needs or
|
||||
not.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>If the data access is not a problem, parallel processing can
|
||||
be implemented in a mainframe environment using parallel job
|
||||
classes, in order to ensure adequate CPU time for all the
|
||||
processes. In an environment other than the mainframe, a similar
|
||||
solution can be put in place with for example threads. The solution
|
||||
has to be robust enough to ensure time slices for all the running
|
||||
processes.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Other key issues in parallel processing include load
|
||||
balancing and the availability of general system resources such as
|
||||
files, database buffer pools etc. Also note that the control table
|
||||
itself can easily become a critical resource.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis role="bold">4. Partitioning</emphasis> Using
|
||||
partitioning allows multiple versions of large batch applications
|
||||
to run concurrently. The purpose of this is to reduce the elapsed
|
||||
time required to process long batch jobs. Processes which can be
|
||||
successfully partitioned are those where the input file can be
|
||||
split and/or the main database tables partitioned to allow the
|
||||
application to run against different sets of data.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In addition, processes which are partitioned must be designed
|
||||
to only process their assigned data set. A partitioning
|
||||
architecture has to be closely tied to the database design and the
|
||||
database partitioning strategy. Please note, that the database
|
||||
partitioning doesn't necessarily mean physical partitioning of
|
||||
the database, although in most cases this is advisable. The
|
||||
following picture illustrates the partitioning
|
||||
approach:!app_style_batch_processing.png|align=center!</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The architecture should be flexible enough to allow dynamic
|
||||
configuration of the number of partitions. Both automatic and user
|
||||
controlled configuration should be considered. Automatic
|
||||
configuration may be based on parameters such as the input file
|
||||
size and/or the number of input records.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis role="bold">4.1 Streaming Approaches</emphasis> The
|
||||
following lists some of the possible streaming approaches.
|
||||
Selecting a streaming approach has to be done on a case-by-case
|
||||
basis.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis>1. Fixed and Even Break-Up of Record
|
||||
Set</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This involves breaking the input record set into an even
|
||||
number of portions (e.g. 10, where each portion will have exactly
|
||||
1/10th of the entire record set). Each portion is then processed by
|
||||
one instance of the batch/extract application.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In order to use this approach, preprocessing will be required
|
||||
to split the recordset up. The result of this split will be a lower
|
||||
and upper bound placement number which can be used as input to the
|
||||
batch/extract application in order to restrict its processing to
|
||||
its portion alone.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Preprocessing could be a large overhead as it has to
|
||||
calculate and determine the bounds of each portion of the record
|
||||
set.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis>2. Breakup by a Key Column</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This involves breaking up the input record set by a key
|
||||
column such as a location code, and assigning data from each key to
|
||||
a batch instance. In order to achieve this, column values can
|
||||
either be</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis>3. Assigned to a batch instance via a streaming
|
||||
table (see below for details).</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis>4. Assigned to a batch instance by a portion of the
|
||||
value (e.g. values 0000-0999, 1000 - 1999, etc.)</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Under option 1, addition of new values will mean a manual
|
||||
reconfiguration of the batch/extract to ensure that the new value
|
||||
is added to a particular instance.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Under option 2, this will ensure that all values are covered
|
||||
via an instance of the batch job. However, the number of values
|
||||
processed by one instance is dependent on the distribution of
|
||||
column values (i.e. there may be a large number of locations in the
|
||||
0000-0999 range, and few in the 1000-1999 range). Under this
|
||||
option, the data range should be designed with streaming in
|
||||
mind.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Under both options, the optimal even distribution of records
|
||||
to batch instances cannot be realized. There is no dynamic
|
||||
configuration of the number of batch instances used.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis>5. Breakup by Views</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This approach is basically breakup by a key column, but on
|
||||
the database level. It involves breaking up the recordset into
|
||||
views. These views will be used by each instance of the batch
|
||||
application during its processing. The breakup will be done by
|
||||
grouping the data.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>With this option, each instance of a batch application will
|
||||
have to be configured to hit a particular view (instead of the
|
||||
master table). Also, with the addition of new data values, this new
|
||||
group of data will have to be included into a view. There is no
|
||||
dynamic configuration capability, as a change in the number of
|
||||
instances will result in a change to the views.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis>6. Addition of a Processing
|
||||
Indicator</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This involves the addition of a new column to the input
|
||||
table, which acts as an indicator. As a preprocessing step, all
|
||||
indicators would be marked to non-processed. During the record
|
||||
fetch stage of the batch application, records are read on the
|
||||
condition that that record is marked non-processed, and once they
|
||||
are read (with lock), they are marked processing. When that record
|
||||
is completed, the indicator is updated to either complete or error.
|
||||
Many instances of a batch application can be started without any
|
||||
changes, as the additional column ensures that a record is only
|
||||
processed once.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>With this option, I/O on the table increased dynamically. In
|
||||
the case of a updating batch application, this impact is reduced,
|
||||
as a write will have to occur anyway.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis>7. Extract Table to a Flat File</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This involves the extraction of the table into a file. This
|
||||
file can then be split into multiple segments and used as input to
|
||||
the batch instances.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>With this option, the additional overhead of extracting the
|
||||
table into a file, and splitting it, may cancel out the effect of
|
||||
multi-streaming. Dynamic configuration can be achieved via changing
|
||||
the file splitting script.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><emphasis>8. Use of a Hashing Column</emphasis></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This scheme involves the addition of a hash column
|
||||
(key/index) to the database tables used to retrieve the driver
|
||||
record. This hash column will have an indicator to determine which
|
||||
instance of the batch application will process this particular row.
|
||||
For example, if there are three batch instances to be started, then
|
||||
an indicator of 'A' will mark that row for processing by
|
||||
instance 1, an indicator of 'B' will mark that row for
|
||||
processing by instance 2, etc.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The procedure used to retrieve the records would then have an
|
||||
additional WHERE clause to select all rows marked by a particular
|
||||
indicator. The inserts in this table would involve the addition of
|
||||
the marker field, which would be defaulted to one of the instances
|
||||
(e.g. 'A').</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>A simple batch application would be used to update the
|
||||
indicators such as to redistribute the load between the different
|
||||
instances. When a sufficiently large number of new rows have been
|
||||
added, this batch can be run (anytime, except in the batch window)
|
||||
to redistribute the new rows to other instances.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Additional instances of the batch application only require
|
||||
the running of the batch application as above to redistribute the
|
||||
indicators to cater for a new number of instances.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>4.2 Database and Application design Principles</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>An architecture that supports multi-streamed applications
|
||||
which run against partitioned database tables using the key column
|
||||
approach, should include a central streaming repository for storing
|
||||
streaming parameters. This provides flexibility and ensures
|
||||
maintainability. The repository will generally consist of a single
|
||||
table known as the streaming table.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Information stored in the streaming table will be static and
|
||||
in general should be maintained by the DBA. The table should
|
||||
consist of one row of information for each stream of a
|
||||
multi-streamed application. The table should have a similar layout
|
||||
to the following table:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><anchor id="a.center"/>center || Streaming Table || | Program
|
||||
ID Code Stream Number (Logical ID of the stream) Low Value of the
|
||||
db key column for this stream High Value of the db key column for
|
||||
this stream | center</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>On program start-up the program id and stream number should
|
||||
be passed to the application from the architecture (Control
|
||||
Processing Tasklet). These variables are used to read the streaming
|
||||
table, to determine what range of data the application is to
|
||||
process (if a key column approach is used). In addition the stream
|
||||
number must be used throughout the processing to:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Add to the output files/database updates in order for the
|
||||
merge process to work properly</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Report normal processing to the batch log and any errors
|
||||
that occur during execution to the architecture error
|
||||
handler</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>4.3 Minimizing Deadlocks When applications run in parallel or
|
||||
streamed, contention in database resources and deadlocks may occur.
|
||||
It is critical that the database design team eliminates potential
|
||||
contention situations as far as possible as part of the database
|
||||
design.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Also ensure that the database index tables are designed with
|
||||
deadlock prevention and performance in mind.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Deadlocks or hot spots often occur in administration or
|
||||
architecture tables such as log tables, control tables, lock tables
|
||||
etc.. The implications of these should be taken into account as
|
||||
well. A realistic stress test is crucial for identifying the
|
||||
possible bottlenecks in the architecture.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>To minimize the impact of conflicts on data, the architecture
|
||||
should provide services such as wait-and-retry intervals when
|
||||
attaching to a database or when encountering a deadlock. This means
|
||||
a built-in mechanism to react to certain database return codes and
|
||||
instead of issuing an immediate error handling, waiting a
|
||||
predetermined amount of time and retrying the database
|
||||
operation.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>4.4 Parameter Passing and Validation</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The streaming architecture should be relatively transparent
|
||||
to application developers. The architecture should perform all
|
||||
tasks associated with running the application in a streamed mode
|
||||
i.e.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Retrieve streaming parameters before application
|
||||
start-up</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Validate streaming parameters before application
|
||||
start-up</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Pass parameters to application at start-up</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The validation should include checks to ensure that:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>the application has sufficient streams to cover the whole
|
||||
data range</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>there are no gaps between streams</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>If the database is partitioned, some additional validation
|
||||
may be necessary to ensure that a single stream does not span
|
||||
database partitions.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Also the architecture should take into consideration the
|
||||
consolidation of streams. Key questions include:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Must all the streams be finished before going into the
|
||||
next job step?</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>What happens if one of the streams aborts?</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
<title id="bps.2">Batch Job Type Specific Concerns</title>
|
||||
<para>Batch Jobs Types (e.g. conversion, pdf generation, report generation, high volume print, etc.) require different
|
||||
technologies in the solution space. For example, conversion may require additional XML technologies, Adobe or iText for
|
||||
PDF generation, different reporting options for report generation, etc. It is often helpful to isolate batch jobs at a
|
||||
minimum by job type so that required dependencies for batch job types don't pollute other application styles. It is also
|
||||
key to leaving the application decoupled by style and by execution environment allowing maximum flexibility at deployment
|
||||
time.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
</chapter>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,546 +0,0 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
|
||||
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd">
|
||||
<chapter id="Container Architecture Overview" lang="en">
|
||||
<title>Container Architecture Overview</title>
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
<title>Introduction</title>
|
||||
<para></para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
<title id="s.1">Simple Container Architecture Overview</title>
|
||||
<para></para>
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.1.1">Introduction</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This chapter covers the overall spring batch architecture.
|
||||
The Spring Container Archtiecture is made up of five logical
|
||||
layers; 1) the Batch Application, 2) the Batch Application Layer,
|
||||
3) the batch core layer, and 4) the batch infrastucture
|
||||
layer.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<informaltable colsep="1" frame="all" rowsep="1">
|
||||
|
||||
<tgroup cols="3">
|
||||
|
||||
<colspec align="center"/>
|
||||
<colspec align="center"/>
|
||||
<colspec align="left"/>
|
||||
<tbody>
|
||||
|
||||
<row><entry><para>Provided
|
||||
By</para></entry><entry><para>Layer</para></entry><entry><para>Description</para></entry></row>
|
||||
|
||||
<row><entry><para>Application
|
||||
Developer</para></entry><entry><para>Batch
|
||||
Application</para></entry><entry><para>This is where the
|
||||
application developer writes their batch jobs and
|
||||
tasklets.</para></entry></row>
|
||||
|
||||
<row><entry><para>Spring Batch Execution
|
||||
Container</para></entry><entry><para>Container Application
|
||||
Layer</para></entry><entry><para>Allows for extending and
|
||||
overwriting of the batch support layer for custom
|
||||
requirements. Facilities implemented in this layer could
|
||||
migrate down to Batch Support Layer. This is also the layer
|
||||
to add the project specific jars required by job types
|
||||
(e.g. reporting jars like Crystal, Brio, etc, form
|
||||
generation jars like Central Pro or Adobe,
|
||||
etc).</para></entry></row>
|
||||
|
||||
<row><entry><para>Spring Batch Execution
|
||||
Container</para></entry><entry><para>Container Support
|
||||
Layer</para></entry><entry><para>Provides default
|
||||
implementations of batch core services including I/O,
|
||||
Restart, Partitioning, Statistics, and
|
||||
configurations</para></entry></row>
|
||||
|
||||
<row><entry><para>Spring Batch Execution
|
||||
Container</para></entry><entry><para>Container Core
|
||||
Layer</para></entry><entry><para>Enables configuration,
|
||||
Common Services & Interfaces,
|
||||
management</para></entry></row>
|
||||
|
||||
<row><entry><para>Spring Batch
|
||||
Infrastructure</para></entry><entry><para>Batch-Infrastructure</para></entry><entry><para>Provides
|
||||
IO support, Batch style transactions, advanced exception
|
||||
handling, batch-template, batch-retry</para></entry></row>
|
||||
|
||||
</tbody>
|
||||
|
||||
</tgroup>
|
||||
|
||||
</informaltable>
|
||||
|
||||
<variablelist>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<term>Figure 2.0</term>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>- Batch Architecture Layers</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The batch architecture is modeled after a container
|
||||
architecture, meaning that there are managed resources
|
||||
essential to high performance batch architectures that are
|
||||
configured through a spring context. The following sect1s
|
||||
will provide a quick review of each layer and their role in
|
||||
the batch architecture.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
</variablelist>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.1.2">Batch Applications</title>
|
||||
<para></para>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.1.3">Container Application Layer</title>
|
||||
<para></para>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.1.4">Container Support Layer</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The batch support layer provides default implementations
|
||||
for all interfaces, interceptors, advice and other core batch
|
||||
services. Figure 2.3.1 illustrates the following logical
|
||||
packages. !Batch Support.png! Although physically they break out
|
||||
into many more than depicted, logically you can think of the
|
||||
groupings in the following manner: * I/O Support packages *
|
||||
Restart Support * Lifecycle Support packages * DAO support
|
||||
layer</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>I/O Support Packages</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The I/O related packages are currently the richest
|
||||
packages in the batch architecture. They are modeled after
|
||||
Spring Patterns of Operations and Templates. For example,
|
||||
you'll see FlatFileInputOperations accompanied with a
|
||||
FlatFileInputTemplate. The FlatFileInputTemplate is wired up
|
||||
with a File Descriptor, which contains a Record Descriptor
|
||||
along with various other properties. With the File and Record
|
||||
Descriptors the InputTemplate supports a callback method that
|
||||
allows for the mapping of a record into an object. This
|
||||
support applies to fixed length records, delimited records
|
||||
and XML records. To further simplify this a
|
||||
DefaultFlatFileDataProvider is supplied an input template,
|
||||
which contains the field and record descriptions, along with
|
||||
a line mapper that knows how to map the line to an object.
|
||||
The next() operation on a record simply needs to
|
||||
readAndMap(lineMapper) a record. This pattern is used over
|
||||
again for XML and SQL input for simple mapping of input
|
||||
records to objects.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In addition to declarative descriptions of the records
|
||||
that can be re-used by multiple batch jobs, the I/O
|
||||
facilities also support configurable validation strategies.
|
||||
The two currently supported are Apache Commons Validator and
|
||||
Spring's VALang.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Restart Support</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The Restart Support provides implementations for a few
|
||||
common restart strategies that will be discussed further in
|
||||
the respective sect1. The following are provided
|
||||
out-of-the-box: * IDList Restart Strategy - a strategy that
|
||||
supports a batch application where the application does not
|
||||
have a "process" flag and needs the batch
|
||||
architecture to track which records have been processed. This
|
||||
is not the ideal scenario. * Last Processed Restart Strategy
|
||||
- when the record can be identified through a where and order
|
||||
by only the last record(s) processed needs to be saved for
|
||||
restart. * No Restart Strategy - some batch jobs simply
|
||||
can't support restart. When they are re-run they are
|
||||
considered to be a new instance of a batch job. * Sql Restart
|
||||
Strategy - [need some additional javadoc for this
|
||||
strategy].</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Lifecycle Support</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.1.5">The Core Layer</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The Batch Core interfaces and services are illustrated in
|
||||
a simplified view of a package diagram. There are roughly seven
|
||||
logical packages: * Core Spring Extensions * Core Batch Advice *
|
||||
Core Batch Configuration * Core Batch Repository * Core Batch
|
||||
Tasklet \ !Batch Core.png! [Figure 2.5] Batch Core Layer</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In the actual physical packaging there are a few more
|
||||
logical services that the batch execution environment provides. The following
|
||||
sections will provide an introduction into each set of core batch
|
||||
facilities.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Core Spring Extensions</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The Core Spring extensions provide the scaffolding for
|
||||
a batch execution environment. This includes facilities for managing the
|
||||
batch architecture in terms of launching, suspending and
|
||||
stopping batch jobs. There is house keeping that goes on,
|
||||
especially in concurrent batch jobs, related to ensuring that
|
||||
batch jobs quiese properly. The lifecycle management provides
|
||||
services for the proper initialization and subsequent
|
||||
shutdown of batch resources and services. The batch
|
||||
architecture is flexible in terms of how batch jobs may be
|
||||
launched. For example, batch jobs can be started via JMX
|
||||
facilities, scripts from the command line that launch a Java
|
||||
VM. It can also support launching batch jobs through web
|
||||
services or http. There are no restrictions. Finally, there
|
||||
are standard batch error codes. These error codes can be
|
||||
exposed to external utilities, like Schedulers, to ensure
|
||||
that batch jobs expose the status of jobs to an operational
|
||||
environment. This is especially important in the batch
|
||||
context where the modus operandi is headless, meaning
|
||||
unattended operation.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Core Batch Advice</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Core Batch Advice is an inventory of the type of advice
|
||||
that batch architectures will inject during the runtime of a
|
||||
batch application. These are defined as a set of extensible
|
||||
interfaces, with a number of default implementations in the
|
||||
support layer that provide some of the most common types of
|
||||
advice. Partition Advice is helpful with large datasets that
|
||||
need to be "chunked" up and run concurrently for
|
||||
better through put. Resource Advice is helpful for
|
||||
registering interest in transactional information so that
|
||||
file locations can be kept in sync with information processed
|
||||
within a transaction. In addition, the resource is associated
|
||||
with the correct step context and its associated
|
||||
configuration properties. Skip advice is applied for records
|
||||
that the tasklet is unable to process. Restart Advice is
|
||||
helpful for Restartable jobs where for advising the job on
|
||||
how to restart. There is considerable variability on how
|
||||
restart can occur. For example, a job may be marking records
|
||||
as "processed" and the restart advice will advise
|
||||
the process with query that restarts the job at the last
|
||||
successfully processed record. Finally, Statistics are vital
|
||||
in operational environments to report on records processed,
|
||||
records skipped and total number of records read. In
|
||||
addition, certain batch jobs lend themselves to custom
|
||||
reporting to expose additional business level information
|
||||
like the number of trades processed or cases opened,
|
||||
etc.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Core Batch Configuration</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Batch configuration is considerably different from
|
||||
online web applications or SOA based applications. The Core
|
||||
Batch Configuration provides a place for configuring runtime
|
||||
properties related to the batch application style. This
|
||||
includes the ability to add Commit Policy. In a batch style
|
||||
application it is often advantageous to keep the commit
|
||||
interval as high as possible when processing Logical Units of
|
||||
Work. Whereas in an online web application with declarative
|
||||
transaction the transaction scope would be at the entrance to
|
||||
a business service, a batch transaction scope may include
|
||||
many logical units of work before a transaction commit is
|
||||
executed. A Start Policy allows a configuration to tell the
|
||||
batch job whether it is Restartable, and if so, what type of
|
||||
restart to initiate. Some jobs are not restartable and care
|
||||
should be taken to ensure that information is not applied
|
||||
multiple times when the business rules do not allow for it.
|
||||
Exception policies deal with what to do when exceptions
|
||||
occur. This impacts logging policies and exception handling.
|
||||
The architecture defines a common set of exceptions that
|
||||
projects can apply handlers to like processing errors,
|
||||
validation errors, parsing errors, missing configuration
|
||||
parameters, etc.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>2.5.4 Container Repository</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This is an internal package for storing the state of a
|
||||
batch job and any associated partition and step status.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Core Batch Tasklet</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The core batch tasklet is where control is handed off to
|
||||
the application. There are a number of patterns that have
|
||||
been observed in processing batch data. Spring Core Batch
|
||||
Tasklet implements the most common patterns and provides and
|
||||
extension point for additional Tasklet processing
|
||||
implementations. The basic idea of tasklet provides the
|
||||
facilities for reading and processing data. The simplest
|
||||
implementation of Tasklet, the ReadProcessTasklet, handles both
|
||||
the input and output of data within one class. An alternative
|
||||
implementation, the DataProviderProcessTasklet, provides
|
||||
functionality for 'split processing'. This type of
|
||||
processing is characterized by separating the reading and
|
||||
processing of batch data into two seperate classes:
|
||||
DataProvider and TaskletProcessor. The DataProvider class
|
||||
provides a solid means for reusablility and enforces good
|
||||
architecture practices. Because an object *must* be returned
|
||||
by the DataProider to continue processing, (Returning null
|
||||
indicates processing should end) a developer is forced to
|
||||
read in all relevant data, place it into domain or value
|
||||
objects, and return the object. The TaskletProcessor will then
|
||||
use this object within the business logic and final
|
||||
output.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.2">Container's Use of batch
|
||||
infrastructure</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Infrastructure Provided I/O</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The I/O core interfaces and implementations provide
|
||||
facilities for simplifying the extraction of data from I/O
|
||||
sources like files and database tables. The key concepts are
|
||||
FieldDescriptors and FieldSets along with appropriate CallBack
|
||||
Handlers. These are modeled after common spring operations and
|
||||
templates like JdbcTemplate. Through the use of LineMappers a
|
||||
developer needs only to describe a record format and write the
|
||||
appropriate callback method that maps the parsed record into an
|
||||
object of their choice. These can either be true POJO objects
|
||||
or Value Objects (structures) that are subsequently available
|
||||
for the tasklet to processs. The interface for Field Descriptors
|
||||
also allows for a level of validation through the use of
|
||||
Spring's VALang or Apache's Common Validator.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Core Batch Interceptors & Interceptor
|
||||
Services</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Batch Operations & Batch Template</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Interceptors and the associated services are the key
|
||||
to how advise is applied in the batch architecture. The
|
||||
interceptors are Point Cuts in the batch lifecycle that
|
||||
allow the injection of advise. The shared lifecycle
|
||||
behavior abstracted through the BatchLifeCycleInterceptor
|
||||
defineds three methods; init, onError and finalize. All
|
||||
subclasses of LifeCycleInterceptor define default behavior
|
||||
for these three methods. The JobLifecycleInterceptor
|
||||
further exposes the methods beforeJob(), beforeStep(),
|
||||
afterJob(), and afterStep() allowing hooks into the
|
||||
lifecycle for specific advise. The Batch Architecture
|
||||
provides default implementations for all lifecycle point
|
||||
cuts, or interception points. The Tasklet Interceptor, in
|
||||
addition to the standard lifecycle methods, implements
|
||||
logic around beforeLuw(), afterLuw(),
|
||||
commitIntervalStarted() and commitIntervalCompleted().
|
||||
Having well defined lifecycle interception points allows
|
||||
for the easy insertion of custom advice into the batch
|
||||
runtime environment.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.3">Batch Execution Container Configurations</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In addition to core facilities for configuring or wiring
|
||||
together jobs and steps with required resources, policies, and
|
||||
interceptors, spring batch allows considerable flexibility in how
|
||||
scalability is achieved. More options for scalability will be
|
||||
available in the future. The important key for scalability in Java
|
||||
is the recognition that there is a limit to what one JVM may scale
|
||||
up to in terms of number of threads, managed resources, memory
|
||||
configuration, etc. The spring batch architecture allows for the
|
||||
configuration of simple batch jobs where one VM and one process is
|
||||
sufficient to do perform the work within a batch window all the way
|
||||
through many threads distributed within a cluster of JEE servers.
|
||||
The figure below illistrates the scalability spectrum.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This is not to be understood as the only way to scale batch
|
||||
jobs as there are many factors. For example, other federated java
|
||||
architectures hold potential like Teracotta or Gigaspaces although
|
||||
there is no current implementation for these distributed models in
|
||||
the current batch architecture. !scalability-model.png! [Figure
|
||||
2.3.1] - Scalability Model</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.3.1">Single VM Simple Batch Execution
|
||||
Container - One Job, One Step, One Partition</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The simplest configuration is one job with with step and
|
||||
hence, one implied partition. Implied means that there is nothing
|
||||
for the developer to consider because the default number of
|
||||
partitions is one. There is typically one input source and one
|
||||
output source in this simple configuration. See the Simple Tasklet
|
||||
Job for an example of what this configuration looks like. A
|
||||
simple configuration still typically configures a datasource
|
||||
context, the batch configuration for describing the Job, Step,
|
||||
along with the associated configured policies, field descriptors,
|
||||
and line mappers. !SimpleTradeConfiguration.jpg! [Figure 2.3.1]
|
||||
Simple Container Configuration</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The details of this configuration will be covered
|
||||
thoroughly in subsequent sect1s of the document but for now it
|
||||
should be understood that Job, the Step, the input template, the
|
||||
file descriptor with its associated line mapper, and the output
|
||||
(e.g. the TradeWriter).</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.3.2">Single VM Multi-threaded Batch Execution
|
||||
Container Configuration - One Job, One Step, Multiple
|
||||
Partitions</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In a Single JVM using partitioning a multi-threaded
|
||||
execution is supported. [This is still work in progress]</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.3.3">Batch Execution Container Hosted in J2EE
|
||||
Container - managed environment</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The J2EE container model has fallen under fire over the
|
||||
past few years for many valid reasons. There are some things that
|
||||
the J2EE container do very well though that projects should
|
||||
consider when planning for scalability with batch architectures.
|
||||
Commercial and open source containers like WebSphere, BEA and
|
||||
JBOSS typically:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>manage datasources effectively along with attendent
|
||||
services like prepared statement caching.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>manage transactions effectively including many
|
||||
configurable properties for long lived transactions.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>manage thread pools more effectively.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>supply robust implementations of JTA, a requirement
|
||||
when batch jobs output to multiple XA resources like JMS and
|
||||
JDBC.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>manage distribution effectively including domains,
|
||||
clusters and cells</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>provide robust JMX management for configuring, managing
|
||||
and administering distributed applications.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>workload management facilities (clusters) provided by
|
||||
J2EE vendors</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Projects are encouraged to deploy batch applications with
|
||||
the simplest configuration possible, but when federated JVMs are
|
||||
a requirement to process volumes of data within a batch window,
|
||||
batch-in-container provides an effective way of distributing the
|
||||
processing. Spring Batch supports this through a simple change in
|
||||
configuration. [Work in progress on the exact implementation -
|
||||
being released as part of M2].</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
</chapter>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,274 +0,0 @@
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
|
||||
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd">
|
||||
<chapter id="container-overview">
|
||||
<title>Overview of the Spring Batch Environment</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.1">
|
||||
Overview of the Spring Batch Simple Batch Execution
|
||||
Environment
|
||||
</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The diagram below provides an overview of the high level
|
||||
components, technical services, and basic operations
|
||||
required by a batch architecture. This architecture
|
||||
framework is a blueprint that has been proven through
|
||||
decades of implementations on the last several generations
|
||||
of platforms (COBOL/Mainframe, C++/Unix, and now
|
||||
Java/anywhere). The Simple Batch Execution Environment
|
||||
provides a physical implementation of the layers, components
|
||||
and technical services commonly found in robust,
|
||||
maintainable systems used to address the creation of simple
|
||||
to complex batch applications, with the infrastructure and
|
||||
extensions to address very complex processing needs. The
|
||||
materials below will walk through the details of the
|
||||
diagram.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.2">
|
||||
Simple Batch Execution Environment high level flow and
|
||||
interaction of the architecture.
|
||||
</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<mediaobject>
|
||||
<imageobject role="fo">
|
||||
<imagedata
|
||||
fileref="images/simple-batch-execution-env.jpg"
|
||||
format="JPG" align="center"
|
||||
width="66%" />
|
||||
</imageobject>
|
||||
<imageobject role="html">
|
||||
<imagedata
|
||||
fileref="images/simple-batch-execution-env.jpg" format="JPG"
|
||||
align="center"
|
||||
width="66%" />
|
||||
</imageobject>
|
||||
<caption>
|
||||
<para>Figure 1: Batch Execution Environment</para>
|
||||
</caption>
|
||||
</mediaobject>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Tiers The application style is organized into four logical
|
||||
tiers, which include Run, Job, Application, and Data tiers.
|
||||
The primary goal for organizing an application according to
|
||||
the tiers is to embed what is known as "separation of
|
||||
concerns" within the system. Effective separation of
|
||||
concerns results in reducing the impact of change to the
|
||||
system.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">Run Tier:</emphasis>
|
||||
The Run Tier is concerned with the scheduling and
|
||||
launching of the application. A vendor product is
|
||||
typically used in this tier to allow time-based and
|
||||
interdependent scheduling of batch jobs as well as
|
||||
providing parallel processing capabilities.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">Job Tier:</emphasis>
|
||||
The Job Tier is responsible for the overall
|
||||
execution of a batch job. It sequentially executes
|
||||
batch steps, ensuring that all steps are in the
|
||||
correct state and all appropriate policies are
|
||||
enforced.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">Application Tier:</emphasis>
|
||||
The Application Tier contains components required to
|
||||
execute the program. It contains specific tasklets
|
||||
that address the required batch functionality and
|
||||
enforces policies around a tasklet execution (e.g.,
|
||||
commit intervals, capture of statistics, etc.)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">Data Tier:</emphasis>
|
||||
The Data Tier provides the integration with the
|
||||
physical data sources that might include databases,
|
||||
files, or queues.
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">Note</emphasis>
|
||||
: In some cases the Job tier can be completely
|
||||
missing and in other cases one Job Script can start
|
||||
several Batch Job instances.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
|
||||
<title id="s.3">High Level Processing Flow</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The diagram above illustrates the flow and architecture
|
||||
components in a typical batch run execution.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Standard interaction is described as follows:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">1.</emphasis>
|
||||
In the Run tier, a Scheduler starts a batch application by
|
||||
invoking a Job Script. The Scheduler identifies what batch
|
||||
process it wants to run by passing the name of the batch
|
||||
process and any required additional parameters to the Job
|
||||
Script.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">2.</emphasis>
|
||||
The Job Script initializes the program and executes any job
|
||||
specific scripts prior to calling the Batch Launcher.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">3.</emphasis>
|
||||
The Batch Launcher starts the Batch Execution Environment
|
||||
based upon any environment settings established in the
|
||||
script.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">3.1</emphasis>
|
||||
The Batch Environment starts and controls the batch execution.
|
||||
It initializes the Job execution environment with static
|
||||
configuration items such as database settings, logging
|
||||
levels and creates a Job based on the Job Configuration
|
||||
created by a Batch Developer.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">4</emphasis>
|
||||
Based on configuration provided by a Batch Developer, the
|
||||
Job sequentially executes steps after checking policies to
|
||||
ensure that each step should be started. The status of the
|
||||
job and step (start time, end time, status such as
|
||||
"started" or "completed") is stored at
|
||||
various points during the process.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.1</emphasis>
|
||||
In order to maintain data integrity, at the application
|
||||
tier, the Step acts as a controller to ensure that either an
|
||||
entire group of actions completes successfully or that none
|
||||
of the actions completes. This group of actions is referred
|
||||
to as a logical unit of work (LUW). The Step controls the
|
||||
overall execution of the Tasklet, ensuring that transaction
|
||||
are committed at the appropriate time, and restart and
|
||||
statistics information is stored appropriately. The first
|
||||
thing the Step is responsible for is the initialization of
|
||||
the data required to begin processing. The Step will
|
||||
interact with other architecture components, such as the
|
||||
Input Source, to setup the data required to be processed.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.1.1</emphasis>
|
||||
The Input Source provides services to access various data
|
||||
sources. It provides location transparency to the Batch
|
||||
Tasklet and hides the physical location details of the data.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.2</emphasis>
|
||||
Once the data is initialized by the Input Source, the Step
|
||||
will call into the Tasklet to begin processing. The Tasklet
|
||||
contains the business logic to define the LUW and the Step
|
||||
repeatedly calls the Tasklets LUW to finish the business
|
||||
function. The Step does this by first invoking the execute
|
||||
method on the Tasklet in order to acquire a single
|
||||
record/set of data for processing.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.2.1</emphasis>
|
||||
Before a record is returned to the Tasklet, it may be
|
||||
validated by any number of validation Frameworks that can be
|
||||
provided to an input source. A single record/set of data is
|
||||
gathered by interacting with the Input Source.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.3</emphasis>
|
||||
Once a record/set has been obtained, the step calls the
|
||||
tasklet to begin processing.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.3.1</emphasis>
|
||||
The Tasklet executes its internal business logic by calling
|
||||
other Business Logic components as necessary. Based on the
|
||||
business service, it requests or persists objects from the
|
||||
data access components.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.3.3</emphasis>
|
||||
Data Access components can be leveraged retrieve or persist
|
||||
domain objects.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.3.4</emphasis>
|
||||
Once the business logic has been executed, the resulting
|
||||
output record is written out by utilizing the Output Source
|
||||
interface. The Step will repeatedly call steps 5.2 -> 5.3
|
||||
for every record provided by the Input Source.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.4</emphasis>
|
||||
Once all of the records are processed, the Step calls the
|
||||
Tasklet to perform any clean up activities such as closing
|
||||
connections, exporting files, etc.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<emphasis role="bold">5.4.1</emphasis>
|
||||
The Step is responsible for committing data associated with
|
||||
the remaining logical units of work as well as performing
|
||||
any finalization and administrative functions (e.g. closing
|
||||
database connections).
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Once the Step has completed finalization the control is
|
||||
passed back to the Job, where any necessary logging or clean
|
||||
up is executed for application termination and wrap-up --
|
||||
provided there are no additional Steps to execute.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
</chapter>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@
|
||||
<glossterm>Tasklet</glossterm>
|
||||
|
||||
<glossdef>
|
||||
<para>An application program created by application developer to
|
||||
process the business logic for an entire Step.</para>
|
||||
<para>A component created by application developer to process the
|
||||
business logic for a Step.</para>
|
||||
</glossdef>
|
||||
</glossentry>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -213,4 +213,4 @@
|
||||
</glossdef>
|
||||
</glossentry>
|
||||
</glossdiv>
|
||||
</glossary>
|
||||
</glossary>
|
||||
@@ -56,16 +56,16 @@
|
||||
<para>Below is a code representation of the same concepts shown
|
||||
above:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
List items = new Arraylist();
|
||||
for(int i = 0; i < commitInterval; i++){
|
||||
for(int i = 0; i < commitInterval; i++){
|
||||
Object item = itemReader.read()
|
||||
Object processedItem = itemProcessor.process(item);
|
||||
items.add(processedItem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
itemWriter.write(items);
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
<title>Configuring a Step</title>
|
||||
@@ -75,14 +75,14 @@
|
||||
potentially contain many collaborators. In order to ease configuration,
|
||||
the Spring Batch namespace can be used:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<job id="sampleJob">
|
||||
<step id="step1" job-repository="jobRepository" transaction-manager="transactionManager">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="itemReader" writer="itemWriter" commit-interval="10"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<job id="sampleJob">
|
||||
<step id="step1" job-repository="jobRepository" transaction-manager="transactionManager">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="itemReader" writer="itemWriter" commit-interval="10"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The configuration above represents the only required dependencies
|
||||
to create a item-oriented step:<itemizedlist>
|
||||
@@ -255,23 +255,23 @@
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
<title>Step restart configuration example</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<job id="footballJob" restartable="true">
|
||||
<step id="playerload" next="gameLoad">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="playerFileItemReader" writer="playerWriter"
|
||||
commit-interval="10" />
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="gameLoad" next="playerSummarization">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="gameFileItemReader" writer="gameWriter"
|
||||
commit-interval="10" allow-start-if-complete="true"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="playerSummarization">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="playerSummarizationSource" writer="summaryWriter"
|
||||
commit-interval="10" start-limit="3"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<job id="footballJob" restartable="true">
|
||||
<step id="playerload" next="gameLoad">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="playerFileItemReader" writer="playerWriter"
|
||||
commit-interval="10" />
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="gameLoad" next="playerSummarization">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="gameFileItemReader" writer="gameWriter"
|
||||
commit-interval="10" allow-start-if-complete="true"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="playerSummarization">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="playerSummarizationSource" writer="summaryWriter"
|
||||
commit-interval="10" start-limit="3"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The above example configuration is for a job that loads in
|
||||
information about football games and summarizes them. It contains
|
||||
@@ -483,15 +483,15 @@
|
||||
newlines. Prefixing a class name with the "+" symbol will indicate that
|
||||
that exception should not cause rollback.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<step id="step1">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="itemReader" writer="itemWriter" commit-interval="2" skip-limit="1"/>
|
||||
<transaction-attributes>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<step id="step1">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="itemReader" writer="itemWriter" commit-interval="2" skip-limit="1"/>
|
||||
<transaction-attributes>
|
||||
+org.springframework.batch.item.validator.ValidationException
|
||||
</transaction-attributes>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
</transaction-attributes>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Transaction attributes can also be used to control other settings
|
||||
such as isolation and propagation behavior. More information on setting
|
||||
@@ -593,15 +593,15 @@
|
||||
interface (or an extension thereof) can be applied to a step via the
|
||||
listeners element:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<step id="step1">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="reader" writer="writer" commit-interval="10"/>
|
||||
<listeners>
|
||||
<listener ref="stepListener"/>
|
||||
</listeners>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<step id="step1">
|
||||
<tasklet reader="reader" writer="writer" commit-interval="10"/>
|
||||
<listeners>
|
||||
<listener ref="stepListener"/>
|
||||
</listeners>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In addition to the <classname>StepListener</classname> interfaces,
|
||||
annotations are provided to address the same concerns.</para>
|
||||
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@
|
||||
for notification before a <classname>Step</classname> is started and
|
||||
after it has ends, whether it ended normally or failed:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
public interface StepExecutionListener extends StepListener {
|
||||
|
||||
void beforeStep(StepExecution stepExecution);
|
||||
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@
|
||||
ExitStatus afterStep(StepExecution stepExecution);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><classname>ExitStatus</classname> is the return type of
|
||||
<methodname>afterStep</methodname> in order to allow listeners the
|
||||
@@ -651,12 +651,12 @@
|
||||
useful to perform logic before a chunk begins processing or after a
|
||||
chunk has completed:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting> public interface ChunkListener extends StepListener {
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[ public interface ChunkListener extends StepListener {
|
||||
|
||||
void beforeChunk();
|
||||
|
||||
void afterChunk();
|
||||
}</programlisting>
|
||||
}]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The <methodname>beforeChunk</methodname> method is called after
|
||||
the transaction is started, but before <methodname>read</methodname>
|
||||
@@ -685,14 +685,14 @@
|
||||
<para>When discussing skip logic above, it was mentioned that it may
|
||||
be beneficial to log out skipped records, so that they can be deal
|
||||
with later. In the case of read errors, this can be done with an
|
||||
<classname>ItemReaderListener:</classname><programlisting> public interface ItemReadListener<T> extends StepListener {
|
||||
<classname>ItemReaderListener:</classname><programlisting><![CDATA[ public interface ItemReadListener<T> extends StepListener {
|
||||
|
||||
void beforeRead();
|
||||
|
||||
void afterRead(T item);
|
||||
|
||||
void onReadError(Exception ex);
|
||||
}</programlisting></para>
|
||||
}]]></programlisting></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The <methodname>beforeRead</methodname> method will be called
|
||||
before each call to <methodname>read</methodname> on the
|
||||
@@ -727,14 +727,14 @@
|
||||
<para>Just as with the <classname>ItemReadListener</classname>, the
|
||||
processing of an item can be 'listened' to:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting> public interface ItemProcessListener<T, S> extends StepListener {
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[ public interface ItemProcessListener<T, S> extends StepListener {
|
||||
|
||||
void beforeProcess(T item);
|
||||
|
||||
void afterProcess(T item, S result);
|
||||
|
||||
void onProcessError(T item, Exception e);
|
||||
}</programlisting>
|
||||
}]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The <methodname>beforeProcess</methodname> method will be called
|
||||
before <methodname>process</methodname> on the
|
||||
@@ -769,14 +769,14 @@
|
||||
<para>The writing of an item can be 'listened' to with the
|
||||
<classname>ItemWriteListener</classname>:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting> public interface ItemWriteListener<S> extends StepListener {
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[ public interface ItemWriteListener<S> extends StepListener {
|
||||
|
||||
void beforeWrite(List<? extends S> items);
|
||||
void beforeWrite(List<? extends S> items);
|
||||
|
||||
void afterWrite(List<? extends S> items);
|
||||
void afterWrite(List<? extends S> items);
|
||||
|
||||
void onWriteError(Exception exception, List<? extends S> items);
|
||||
}</programlisting>
|
||||
void onWriteError(Exception exception, List<? extends S> items);
|
||||
}]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The <methodname>beforeWrite</methodname> method will be called
|
||||
before <methodname>write</methodname> on the
|
||||
@@ -816,8 +816,8 @@
|
||||
this reason, there is a separate interface for tracking skipped
|
||||
items:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
public interface SkipListener<T,S> extends StepListener {
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
public interface SkipListener<T,S> extends StepListener {
|
||||
|
||||
void onSkipInRead(Throwable t);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@
|
||||
void onSkipInWrite(S item, Throwable t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><methodname>onSkipInRead</methodname> will be called whenever an
|
||||
item is skipped while reading. It should be noted that rollbacks may
|
||||
@@ -889,18 +889,19 @@
|
||||
consist as a simple stored procedure call? You could implement the call as
|
||||
an <classname>ItemReader</classname> and return null after the procedure
|
||||
finishes, but it is a bit unnatural since there would need to be a no-op
|
||||
<classname>ItemWriter</classname> and lots of overhead for transaction
|
||||
handling, listeners, etc. Spring Batch provides an implementation of
|
||||
<classname>Step</classname> for this scenario:
|
||||
<classname>TaskletStep</classname>. As explained in Chapter 2, the
|
||||
<classname>Tasklet</classname> is a simple interface that has one method,
|
||||
<methodname>execute</methodname>, which will be a called once for the
|
||||
whole <classname>Step</classname>. <classname> Tasklet</classname>
|
||||
implementors might call a stored procedure, a script, or a simple SQL
|
||||
update statement. To create a <classname>TaskletStep</classname>, the
|
||||
'tasklet' attribute should reference a bean defining a
|
||||
<classname>Tasklet</classname> object; no 'tasklet' element is needed
|
||||
within the 'step':</para>
|
||||
<classname>ItemWriter</classname>. Spring Batch provides the
|
||||
<classname>TaskletStep</classname> for this scenario. </para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The <classname>Tasklet</classname> is a simple interface that has
|
||||
one method, <methodname>execute</methodname>, which will be a called
|
||||
repeatedly by the <classname>TaskletStep</classname> until it either
|
||||
returns <literal>FINISHED</literal> or throws an exception to signal a
|
||||
failure. Each call to the <classname>Tasklet</classname> is wrapped in a
|
||||
transaction. <classname>Tasklet</classname> implementors might call a
|
||||
stored procedure, a script, or a simple SQL update statement. To create a
|
||||
<classname>TaskletStep</classname>, the 'tasklet' attribute should
|
||||
reference a bean defining a <classname>Tasklet</classname> object; no
|
||||
'tasklet' element is needed within the 'step':</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<step id="step1" <emphasis role="bold">tasklet="myTasklet"</emphasis> />
|
||||
@@ -926,15 +927,15 @@
|
||||
this class without having to write an adapter for the
|
||||
<classname>Tasklet</classname> interface:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<bean id="myTasklet" class="org.springframework.batch.core.step.tasklet.TaskletAdapter">
|
||||
<property name="targetObject">
|
||||
<bean class="org.mycompany.FooDao">
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
<property name="targetMethod" value-"updateFoo" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<bean id="myTasklet" class="org.springframework.batch.core.step.tasklet.TaskletAdapter">
|
||||
<property name="targetObject">
|
||||
<bean class="org.mycompany.FooDao">
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
<property name="targetMethod" value-"updateFoo" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
@@ -949,7 +950,7 @@
|
||||
project, is a <classname>Tasklet</classname> implementation with just
|
||||
such a responsibility:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting> public class FileDeletingTasklet implements Tasklet, InitializingBean {
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[ public class FileDeletingTasklet implements Tasklet, InitializingBean {
|
||||
|
||||
private Resource directory;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -958,7 +959,7 @@
|
||||
Assert.state(dir.isDirectory());
|
||||
|
||||
File[] files = dir.listFiles();
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < files.length; i++) {
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < files.length; i++) {
|
||||
boolean deleted = files[i].delete();
|
||||
if (!deleted) {
|
||||
throw new UnexpectedJobExecutionException("Could not delete file " + files[i].getPath());
|
||||
@@ -974,7 +975,7 @@
|
||||
public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
|
||||
Assert.notNull(directory, "directory must be set");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}</programlisting>
|
||||
}]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The above <classname>Tasklet</classname> implementation will
|
||||
delete all files within a given directory. It should be noted that the
|
||||
@@ -982,22 +983,22 @@
|
||||
that is left is to reference the <classname>Tasklet</classname> from the
|
||||
<classname>Step</classname>:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<job id="taskletJob">
|
||||
<step id="deleteFilesInDir" tasklet="fileDeletingTasklet"/>
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<job id="taskletJob">
|
||||
<step id="deleteFilesInDir" tasklet="fileDeletingTasklet"/>
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="fileDeletingTasklet"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.batch.sample.tasklet.FileDeletingTasklet">
|
||||
<property name="directoryResource">
|
||||
<bean id="directory"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.core.io.FileSystemResource">
|
||||
<constructor-arg value="target/test-outputs/test-dir" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
<bean id="fileDeletingTasklet"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.batch.sample.tasklet.FileDeletingTasklet">
|
||||
<property name="directoryResource">
|
||||
<bean id="directory"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.core.io.FileSystemResource">
|
||||
<constructor-arg value="target/test-outputs/test-dir" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
</property>
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1034,18 +1035,18 @@
|
||||
<para>This can be achieved using the 'next' attribute of the step
|
||||
element:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><programlisting>
|
||||
<job id="job">
|
||||
<step id="stepA" next="stepB" />
|
||||
<step id="stepB" next="stepC"/>
|
||||
<step id="stepC" />
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
<para><programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<job id="job">
|
||||
<step id="stepA" next="stepB" />
|
||||
<step id="stepB" next="stepC"/>
|
||||
<step id="stepC" />
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>In the scenario above, 'step A' will execute first because it
|
||||
is the first <classname>Step</classname> listed. If 'step A' completes
|
||||
normally, then 'step B' will execute, and so on. However, if 'step A'
|
||||
fails, then the entire <classname>Job</classname> will fail and 'step B'
|
||||
will not execute.</para>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>In the scenario above, 'step A' will execute first because
|
||||
it is the first <classname>Step</classname> listed. If 'step A'
|
||||
completes normally, then 'step B' will execute, and so on. However, if
|
||||
'step A' fails, then the entire <classname>Job</classname> will fail and
|
||||
'step B' will not execute.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<note>
|
||||
<para>With the Spring Batch namespace, the first step listed in the
|
||||
@@ -1103,17 +1104,17 @@
|
||||
<para>The next element specifies a pattern to match and the step to
|
||||
execute next:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><programlisting>
|
||||
<job id="job">
|
||||
<step id="stepA">
|
||||
<next on="FAILED" to="stepB" />
|
||||
<next on="*" to="stepC" />
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="stepB" next="stepC" />
|
||||
<step id="stepC" />
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
<para><programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<job id="job">
|
||||
<step id="stepA">
|
||||
<next on="FAILED" to="stepB" />
|
||||
<next on="*" to="stepC" />
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="stepB" next="stepC" />
|
||||
<step id="stepC" />
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting></para>
|
||||
]]></programlisting></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The "on" attribute of a transition element uses a simple
|
||||
pattern-matching scheme to match the <classname>ExitStatus</classname>
|
||||
@@ -1161,10 +1162,10 @@
|
||||
it fails, and so on. The example above contains the following 'next'
|
||||
element:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<next on="FAILED" to="stepB" />
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<next on="FAILED" to="stepB" />
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>At first glance, it would appear that the 'on' attribute
|
||||
references the <classname>BatchStatus</classname> of the
|
||||
@@ -1181,14 +1182,14 @@
|
||||
code needs to be different? A good example comes from the skip sample
|
||||
job within the samples project:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<step id="step1">
|
||||
<end on="FAILED" />
|
||||
<next on="COMPLETED WITH SKIPS" to="errorPrint1" />
|
||||
<next on="*" to="step2" />
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<step id="step1">
|
||||
<end on="FAILED" />
|
||||
<next on="COMPLETED WITH SKIPS" to="errorPrint1" />
|
||||
<next on="*" to="step2" />
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The above step has three possibilities:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1214,18 +1215,18 @@
|
||||
change the exit code based on the condition of the execution having
|
||||
skipped records:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting> public class SkipCheckingListener extends StepExecutionListenerSupport {
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[ public class SkipCheckingListener extends StepExecutionListenerSupport {
|
||||
|
||||
public ExitStatus afterStep(StepExecution stepExecution) {
|
||||
if (!stepExecution.getExitStatus().getExitCode().equals(ExitStatus.FAILED.getExitCode())
|
||||
&& stepExecution.getSkipCount() > 0) {
|
||||
&& stepExecution.getSkipCount() > 0) {
|
||||
return new ExitStatus("COMPLETED WITH SKIPS");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}</programlisting>
|
||||
}]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The above code is a <classname>StepExecutionListener</classname>
|
||||
that first checks to make sure the <classname>Step</classname> was
|
||||
@@ -1253,7 +1254,7 @@
|
||||
after the following step executes, the <classname>Job</classname> will
|
||||
end:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><programlisting> <step id="stepC" /></programlisting></para>
|
||||
<para><programlisting><![CDATA[ <step id="stepC" />]]></programlisting></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>If no transitions are defined for a <classname>Step</classname>,
|
||||
then the <classname>Job</classname>'s statuses will be defined as
|
||||
@@ -1312,12 +1313,12 @@
|
||||
fails, the <classname>Job</classname> will not be restartable (because
|
||||
the status is COMPLETED).</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting> <step id="step1" next="step2">
|
||||
<step id="step2">
|
||||
<end on="FAILED"/>
|
||||
<next on="*" to="step3"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="step3"></programlisting>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[ <step id="step1" next="step2">
|
||||
<step id="step2">
|
||||
<end on="FAILED"/>
|
||||
<next on="*" to="step3"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="step3">]]></programlisting>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
@@ -1341,12 +1342,12 @@
|
||||
Additionally, if step2 fails, and the <classname>Job</classname> is
|
||||
restarted, then execution will begin again on step2.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting> <step id="step1" next="step2">
|
||||
<step id="step2">
|
||||
<fail on="FAILED" exit-code="EARLY TERMINATION"/>
|
||||
<next on="*" to="step3"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="step3"></programlisting>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[ <step id="step1" next="step2">
|
||||
<step id="step2">
|
||||
<fail on="FAILED" exit-code="EARLY TERMINATION"/>
|
||||
<next on="*" to="step3"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="step3">]]></programlisting>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
@@ -1364,10 +1365,10 @@
|
||||
the job will then stop. Once it is restarted, execution will begin on
|
||||
step2.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><programlisting> <step id="step1">
|
||||
<stop on="COMPLETED" restart="step2"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="step2"/></programlisting></para>
|
||||
<para><programlisting><![CDATA[ <step id="step1">
|
||||
<stop on="COMPLETED" restart="step2"/>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<step id="step2"/>]]></programlisting></para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1380,7 +1381,7 @@
|
||||
<classname>JobExecutionDecider</classname> can be used to assist in the
|
||||
decision.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><programlisting>
|
||||
<para><programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
public class MyDecider implements JobExecutionDecider {
|
||||
|
||||
public String decide(JobExecution jobExecution, StepExecution stepExecution) {
|
||||
@@ -1394,27 +1395,27 @@
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting></para>
|
||||
]]></programlisting></para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In the job configuration, a "decision" tag will specify the
|
||||
decider to use as well as all of the transitions.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para><programlisting>
|
||||
<job id="job">
|
||||
<step id="step1" next="decision" />
|
||||
<para><programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<job id="job">
|
||||
<step id="step1" next="decision" />
|
||||
|
||||
<decision id="skipCheckingDecision" decider="decider">
|
||||
<next on="FAILED" to="step2" />
|
||||
<next on="COMPLETED" to="step3" />
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<decision id="skipCheckingDecision" decider="decider">
|
||||
<next on="FAILED" to="step2" />
|
||||
<next on="COMPLETED" to="step3" />
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step id="step2" next="step3"/>
|
||||
<step id="step3" />
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
<step id="step2" next="step3"/>
|
||||
<step id="step3" />
|
||||
</job>
|
||||
|
||||
<bean id="decider" class="com.MyDecider"/>
|
||||
<bean id="decider" class="com.MyDecider"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting></para>
|
||||
]]></programlisting></para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section id="split-flows">
|
||||
@@ -1431,16 +1432,16 @@
|
||||
elements such as the 'next' attribute or the 'next', 'end', 'fail', or
|
||||
'pause' elements.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting> <split id="split1" next="step4">
|
||||
<flow>
|
||||
<step id="step1" next="step2"/>
|
||||
<step id="step2"/>
|
||||
</flow>
|
||||
<flow>
|
||||
<step id="step3"/>
|
||||
</flow>
|
||||
</split>
|
||||
<step id="step4"/></programlisting>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[ <split id="split1" next="step4">
|
||||
<flow>
|
||||
<step id="step1" next="step2"/>
|
||||
<step id="step2"/>
|
||||
</flow>
|
||||
<flow>
|
||||
<step id="step3"/>
|
||||
</flow>
|
||||
</split>
|
||||
<step id="step4"/>]]></programlisting>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1454,14 +1455,14 @@
|
||||
Flat File resources can be configured using standard Spring
|
||||
constructs:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<bean id="flatFileItemReader"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.batch.item.file.FlatFileItemReader">
|
||||
<property name="resource"
|
||||
value="file://outputs/20070122.testStream.CustomerReportStep.TEMP.txt" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<bean id="flatFileItemReader"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.batch.item.file.FlatFileItemReader">
|
||||
<property name="resource"
|
||||
value="file://outputs/20070122.testStream.CustomerReportStep.TEMP.txt" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The above <classname>Resource</classname> will load the file from
|
||||
the file system location specified. Note that absolute locations have to
|
||||
@@ -1471,13 +1472,13 @@
|
||||
at runtime as a parameter to the job. This could be solved using '-D'
|
||||
parameters, i.e. a system property:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<bean id="flatFileItemReader"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.batch.item.file.FlatFileItemReader">
|
||||
<property name="resource" value="${input.file.name}" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<bean id="flatFileItemReader"
|
||||
class="org.springframework.batch.item.file.FlatFileItemReader">
|
||||
<property name="resource" value="${input.file.name}" />
|
||||
</bean>
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>All that would be required for this solution to work would be a
|
||||
system argument (-Dinput.file.name="file://file.txt"). (Note that although
|
||||
@@ -1543,22 +1544,22 @@
|
||||
must be added explicitly, either by using the <literal>batch</literal>
|
||||
namespace:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
|
||||
xmlns:batch="http://www.springframework.org/schema/batch"
|
||||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="...">
|
||||
xsi:schemaLocation="...">
|
||||
...
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
</beans>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>or by including a bean definition explicitly for
|
||||
the<classname>Step</classname> (but not both):</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.batch.core.scope.StepScope" />
|
||||
<programlisting><![CDATA[
|
||||
<bean class="org.springframework.batch.core.scope.StepScope" />
|
||||
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
]]></programlisting>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</chapter>
|
||||
</chapter>
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user