SPRNET-1444 update documentation to reflect new default transaction isolation level Unspecified
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
|
||||
Changes (1.3.2 to 2.0)
|
||||
========================
|
||||
|
||||
Protected fields were changed to private. Access is now allowed via public/protected property member.
|
||||
Members marked as Obsolete before 2.0 release were removed.
|
||||
1. Default transaction isolation level is now IsolationLevel.Unspecified instead of old IsolationLevel.ReadUncommitted
|
||||
- You need to update your configuration to set the isolation level where old ReadUncommitted was expected, see Spring documentation's Transaction Management chapter
|
||||
|
||||
2. Protected fields were changed to private. Access is now allowed via public/protected property member.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Most of members marked as Obsolete before 2.0 release were removed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Changes (1.3.1 to 1.3.2)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@
|
||||
Spring.Transaction.TransactionPropagation enumeration, namely Required,
|
||||
Supports, Mandatory, RequiresNew, NotSupported, Never, Nested. The
|
||||
string used for ISOLATION_NAME are those defined on the
|
||||
System.Data.IsolationLevel enumberateion, namely ReadCommitted,
|
||||
System.Data.IsolationLevel enumeration, namely ReadCommitted,
|
||||
ReadUncommitted, RepeatableRead, Serializable.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The TransactionProxyFactoryObject allows you to set optional "pre"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ mgr.DeleteTwoTestObjects("Jack", "Jill");
|
||||
|
||||
<entry>No</entry>
|
||||
|
||||
<entry>ReadCommitted</entry>
|
||||
<entry>Unspecified</entry>
|
||||
|
||||
<entry>The transaction isolation level</entry>
|
||||
</row>
|
||||
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ mgr.DeleteTwoTestObjects("Jack", "Jill");
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>The isolation level is
|
||||
<literal>IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted</literal></para>
|
||||
<literal>IsolationLevel.Unspecified</literal></para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user