Sync docs from master to gh-pages

This commit is contained in:
buildmaster
2018-01-25 16:59:06 +00:00
parent 6ee2989fa3
commit e42ea9c343
37 changed files with 3281 additions and 851 deletions

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ contracts, one for the positive case and one for the negative case. Contract tes
used to test contracts between applications and not to simulate full behavior.</p></td></tr></table></div></div><div class="section"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="_how_it_works" href="#_how_it_works"></a>2.3&nbsp;How It Works</h2></div></div></div><p>This section explores how Spring Cloud Contract Verifier with Stub Runner works.</p><div class="section"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="_defining_the_contract" href="#_defining_the_contract"></a>2.3.1&nbsp;Defining the contract</h3></div></div></div><p>As consumers of services, we need to define what exactly we want to achieve. We need to
formulate our expectations. That is why we write contracts.</p><p>Assume that you want to send a request containing the ID of a client company and the
amount it wants to borrow from us. You also want to send it to the /fraudcheck url via
the PUT method.</p><pre class="programlisting"><span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">package</span> contracts
the PUT method.</p><p><b>Groovy DSL.&nbsp;</b>
</p><pre class="programlisting"><span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">package</span> contracts
org.springframework.cloud.contract.spec.Contract.make {
request { <span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-comment">// (1)</span>
@@ -83,7 +84,61 @@ From the Producer perspective, in the autogenerated producer-side test:
(8) - and JSON body equal to
{ "fraudCheckStatus": "FRAUD", "rejectionReason": "Amount too high" }
(9) - with header `Content-Type` matching `application/json.*`
*/</span></pre></div><div class="section"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="_client_side" href="#_client_side"></a>2.3.2&nbsp;Client Side</h3></div></div></div><p>Spring Cloud Contract generates stubs, which you can use during client-side testing.
*/</span></pre><p>
</p><p><b>YAML.&nbsp;</b>
</p><pre class="programlisting">request: # (1)
method: PUT # (2)
url: /fraudcheck # (3)
body: # (4)
"client.id": 1234567890
loanAmount: 99999
headers: # (5)
Content-Type: application/json
matchers:
body:
- path: $.['client.id'] # (6)
type: by_regex
value: "[0-9]{10}"
response: # (7)
status: 200 # (8)
body: # (9)
fraudCheckStatus: "FRAUD"
"rejection.reason": "Amount too high"
headers: # (10)
Content-Type: application/json;charset=UTF-8
#From the Consumer perspective, when shooting a request in the integration test:
#
#(1) - If the consumer sends a request
#(2) - With the "PUT" method
#(3) - to the URL "/fraudcheck"
#(4) - with the JSON body that
# * has a field `clientId`
# * has a field `loanAmount` that is equal to `99999`
#(5) - with header `Content-Type` equal to `application/json`
#(6) - and a `client.id` json entry matches the regular expression `[0-9]{10}`
#(7) - then the response will be sent with
#(8) - status equal `200`
#(9) - and JSON body equal to
# { "fraudCheckStatus": "FRAUD", "rejectionReason": "Amount too high" }
#(10) - with header `Content-Type` equal to `application/json`
#
#From the Producer perspective, in the autogenerated producer-side test:
#
#(1) - A request will be sent to the producer
#(2) - With the "PUT" method
#(3) - to the URL "/fraudcheck"
#(4) - with the JSON body that
# * has a field `clientId` `1234567890`
# * has a field `loanAmount` that is equal to `99999`
#(5) - with header `Content-Type` equal to `application/json`
#(7) - then the test will assert if the response has been sent with
#(8) - status equal `200`
#(9) - and JSON body equal to
# { "fraudCheckStatus": "FRAUD", "rejectionReason": "Amount too high" }
#(10) - with header `Content-Type` equal to `application/json;charset=UTF-8`</pre><p>
</p></div><div class="section"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="_client_side" href="#_client_side"></a>2.3.2&nbsp;Client Side</h3></div></div></div><p>Spring Cloud Contract generates stubs, which you can use during client-side testing.
You get a running WireMock instance/Messaging route that simulates the service.
You would like to feed that instance with a proper stub definition.</p><p>At some point in time, you need to send a request to the Fraud Detection service.</p><pre class="programlisting">ResponseEntity&lt;FraudServiceResponse&gt; response =
restTemplate.exchange(<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-string">"http://localhost:"</span> + port + <span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-string">"/fraudcheck"</span>, HttpMethod.PUT,
@@ -98,7 +153,7 @@ You would like to feed that instance with a proper stub definition.</p><p>At som
(or random) port.</p></div><div class="section"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="_server_side" href="#_server_side"></a>2.3.3&nbsp;Server Side</h3></div></div></div><p>Since you are developing your stub, you need to be sure that it actually resembles your
concrete implementation. You cannot have a situation where your stub acts in one way and
your application behaves in a different way, especially in production.</p><p>To ensure that your application behaves the way you define in your stub, tests are
generated from the stub you provide.</p><p>The autogenerated test looks like this:</p><pre class="programlisting"><em><span class="hl-annotation" style="color: gray">@Test</span></em>
generated from the stub you provide.</p><p>The autogenerated test looks, more or less, like this:</p><pre class="programlisting"><em><span class="hl-annotation" style="color: gray">@Test</span></em>
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">public</span> <span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">void</span> validate_shouldMarkClientAsFraud() <span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">throws</span> Exception {
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-comment">// given:</span>
MockMvcRequestSpecification request = given()
@@ -207,9 +262,10 @@ client wants to borrow. You want to send it to the <code class="literal">/fraudc
FraudServiceResponse.<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">class</span>);</pre><p>For simplicity, the port of the Fraud Detection service is set to <code class="literal">8080</code>, and the
application runs on <code class="literal">8090</code>.</p><p>If you start the test at this point, it breaks, because no service currently runs on port
<code class="literal">8080</code>.</p><p><span class="strong"><strong>Clone the Fraud Detection service repository locally.</strong></span></p><p>You can start by playing around with the server side contract. To do so, you must first
clone it.</p><pre class="programlisting">git clone https://your-git-server.com/server-side.git local-http-server-repo</pre><p><span class="strong"><strong>Define the contract locally in the repo of Fraud Detection service.</strong></span></p><p>As a consumer, you need to define what exactly you want to achieve. You need to formulate
clone it.</p><pre class="programlisting">$ git clone https://your-git-server.com/server-side.git local-http-server-repo</pre><p><span class="strong"><strong>Define the contract locally in the repo of Fraud Detection service.</strong></span></p><p>As a consumer, you need to define what exactly you want to achieve. You need to formulate
your expectations. To do so, write the following contract:</p><div class="important" style="margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.5in;"><table border="0" summary="Important"><tr><td rowspan="2" align="center" valign="top" width="25"><img alt="[Important]" src="images/important.png"></td><th align="left">Important</th></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><p>Place the contract under <code class="literal">src/test/resources/contracts/fraud</code> folder. The <code class="literal">fraud</code> folder
is important because the producer&#8217;s test base class name references that folder.</p></td></tr></table></div><pre class="programlisting"><span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">package</span> contracts
is important because the producer&#8217;s test base class name references that folder.</p></td></tr></table></div><p><b>Groovy DSL.&nbsp;</b>
</p><pre class="programlisting"><span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">package</span> contracts
org.springframework.cloud.contract.spec.Contract.make {
request { <span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-comment">// (1)</span>
@@ -265,8 +321,63 @@ From the Producer perspective, in the autogenerated producer-side test:
(8) - and JSON body equal to
{ "fraudCheckStatus": "FRAUD", "rejectionReason": "Amount too high" }
(9) - with header `Content-Type` matching `application/json.*`
*/</span></pre><p>The Contract is written using a statically typed Groovy DSL. You might wonder what about
those <code class="literal">value(client(&#8230;&#8203;), server(&#8230;&#8203;))</code> parts. By using this notation, Spring Cloud
*/</span></pre><p>
</p><p><b>YAML.&nbsp;</b>
</p><pre class="programlisting">request: # (1)
method: PUT # (2)
url: /fraudcheck # (3)
body: # (4)
"client.id": 1234567890
loanAmount: 99999
headers: # (5)
Content-Type: application/json
matchers:
body:
- path: $.['client.id'] # (6)
type: by_regex
value: "[0-9]{10}"
response: # (7)
status: 200 # (8)
body: # (9)
fraudCheckStatus: "FRAUD"
"rejection.reason": "Amount too high"
headers: # (10)
Content-Type: application/json;charset=UTF-8
#From the Consumer perspective, when shooting a request in the integration test:
#
#(1) - If the consumer sends a request
#(2) - With the "PUT" method
#(3) - to the URL "/fraudcheck"
#(4) - with the JSON body that
# * has a field `clientId`
# * has a field `loanAmount` that is equal to `99999`
#(5) - with header `Content-Type` equal to `application/json`
#(6) - and a `client.id` json entry matches the regular expression `[0-9]{10}`
#(7) - then the response will be sent with
#(8) - status equal `200`
#(9) - and JSON body equal to
# { "fraudCheckStatus": "FRAUD", "rejectionReason": "Amount too high" }
#(10) - with header `Content-Type` equal to `application/json`
#
#From the Producer perspective, in the autogenerated producer-side test:
#
#(1) - A request will be sent to the producer
#(2) - With the "PUT" method
#(3) - to the URL "/fraudcheck"
#(4) - with the JSON body that
# * has a field `clientId` `1234567890`
# * has a field `loanAmount` that is equal to `99999`
#(5) - with header `Content-Type` equal to `application/json`
#(7) - then the test will assert if the response has been sent with
#(8) - status equal `200`
#(9) - and JSON body equal to
# { "fraudCheckStatus": "FRAUD", "rejectionReason": "Amount too high" }
#(10) - with header `Content-Type` equal to `application/json;charset=UTF-8`</pre><p>
</p><p>The YML contract is quite straight-forward. However when you take a look at the Contract
written using a statically typed Groovy DSL - you might wonder what the
<code class="literal">value(client(&#8230;&#8203;), server(&#8230;&#8203;))</code> parts are. By using this notation, Spring Cloud
Contract lets you define parts of a JSON block, a URL, etc., which are dynamic. In case
of an identifier or a timestamp, you need not hardcode a value. You want to allow some
different ranges of values. To enable ranges of values, you can set regular expressions
@@ -298,8 +409,8 @@ First, add the <code class="literal">Spring Cloud Contract</code> BOM.</p><pre c
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;/configuration&gt;</span>
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;/plugin&gt;</span></pre><p>Since the plugin was added, you get the <code class="literal">Spring Cloud Contract Verifier</code> features which,
from the provided contracts:</p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: disc; "><li class="listitem">generate and run tests</li><li class="listitem">produce and install stubs</li></ul></div><p>You do not want to generate tests since you, as the consumer, want only to play with the
stubs. You need to skip the test generation and execution. When you execute:</p><pre class="programlisting"><span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">cd</span> local-http-server-repo
./mvnw clean install -DskipTests</pre><p>In the logs, you see something like this:</p><pre class="programlisting">[INFO] --- spring-cloud-contract-maven-plugin:<span class="hl-number">1.0</span>.<span class="hl-number">0.</span>BUILD-SNAPSHOT:generateStubs (default-generateStubs) @ http-server ---
stubs. You need to skip the test generation and execution. When you execute:</p><pre class="programlisting">$ <span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">cd</span> local-http-server-repo
$ ./mvnw clean install -DskipTests</pre><p>In the logs, you see something like this:</p><pre class="programlisting">[INFO] --- spring-cloud-contract-maven-plugin:<span class="hl-number">1.0</span>.<span class="hl-number">0.</span>BUILD-SNAPSHOT:generateStubs (default-generateStubs) @ http-server ---
[INFO] Building jar: /some/path/http-server/target/http-server-<span class="hl-number">0.0</span>.<span class="hl-number">1</span>-SNAPSHOT-stubs.jar
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:<span class="hl-number">2.6</span>:jar (default-jar) @ http-server ---
@@ -349,8 +460,8 @@ you wish.</p><p>Once you are satisfied with the results and the test passes, pub
the server side. Currently, the consumer side work is done.</p></div><div class="section"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="_producer_side_fraud_detection_server" href="#_producer_side_fraud_detection_server"></a>2.4.3&nbsp;Producer side (Fraud Detection server)</h3></div></div></div><p>As a developer of the Fraud Detection server (a server to the Loan Issuance service):</p><p><span class="strong"><strong>Create an initial implementation.</strong></span></p><p>As a reminder, you can see the initial implementation here:</p><pre class="programlisting"><em><span class="hl-annotation" style="color: gray">@RequestMapping(value = "/fraudcheck", method = PUT)</span></em>
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">public</span> FraudCheckResult fraudCheck(<em><span class="hl-annotation" style="color: gray">@RequestBody</span></em> FraudCheck fraudCheck) {
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">return</span> <span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">new</span> FraudCheckResult(FraudCheckStatus.OK, NO_REASON);
}</pre><p><span class="strong"><strong>Take over the pull request.</strong></span></p><pre class="programlisting">git checkout -b contract-change-pr master
git pull https://your-git-server.com/server-side-fork.git contract-change-pr</pre><p>You must add the dependencies needed by the autogenerated tests:</p><pre class="programlisting"><span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;dependency&gt;</span>
}</pre><p><span class="strong"><strong>Take over the pull request.</strong></span></p><pre class="programlisting">$ git checkout -b contract-change-pr master
$ git pull https://your-git-server.com/server-side-fork.git contract-change-pr</pre><p>You must add the dependencies needed by the autogenerated tests:</p><pre class="programlisting"><span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;dependency&gt;</span>
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;groupId&gt;</span>org.springframework.cloud<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;/groupId&gt;</span>
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;artifactId&gt;</span>spring-cloud-starter-contract-verifier<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;/artifactId&gt;</span>
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;scope&gt;</span>test<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-tag">&lt;/scope&gt;</span>
@@ -420,8 +531,9 @@ like this:</p><pre class="programlisting"><em><span class="hl-annotation" style=
DocumentContext parsedJson = JsonPath.parse(response.getBody().asString());
assertThatJson(parsedJson).field(<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-string">"['fraudCheckStatus']"</span>).matches(<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-string">"[A-Z]{5}"</span>);
assertThatJson(parsedJson).field(<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-string">"['rejection.reason']"</span>).isEqualTo(<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-string">"Amount too high"</span>);
}</pre><p>As you can see, all the <code class="literal">producer()</code> parts of the Contract that were present in the
<code class="literal">value(consumer(&#8230;&#8203;), producer(&#8230;&#8203;))</code> blocks got injected into the test.</p><p>Note that, on the producer side, you are also doing TDD. The expectations are expressed
}</pre><p>If you used the Groovy DSL, you can see, all the <code class="literal">producer()</code> parts of the Contract that were present in the
<code class="literal">value(consumer(&#8230;&#8203;), producer(&#8230;&#8203;))</code> blocks got injected into the test.
In case of using YAML, the same applied for the <code class="literal">matchers</code> sections of the <code class="literal">response</code>.</p><p>Note that, on the producer side, you are also doing TDD. The expectations are expressed
in the form of a test. This test sends a request to our own application with the URL,
headers, and body defined in the contract. It also is expecting precisely defined values
in the response. In other words, you have the <code class="literal">red</code> part of <code class="literal">red</code>, <code class="literal">green</code>, and
@@ -434,11 +546,11 @@ implementation:</p><pre class="programlisting"><em><span class="hl-annotation" s
<span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">return</span> <span xmlns:d="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" class="hl-keyword">new</span> FraudCheckResult(FraudCheckStatus.OK, NO_REASON);
}</pre><p>When you execute <code class="literal">./mvnw clean install</code> again, the tests pass. Since the <code class="literal">Spring Cloud
Contract Verifier</code> plugin adds the tests to the <code class="literal">generated-test-sources</code>, you can
actually run those tests from your IDE.</p><p><span class="strong"><strong>Deploy your app.</strong></span></p><p>Once you finish your work, you can deploy your change. First, merge the branch:</p><pre class="programlisting">git checkout master
git merge --no-ff contract-change-pr
git push origin master</pre><p>Your CI might run something like <code class="literal">./mvnw clean deploy</code>, which would publish both the
application and the stub artifacts.</p></div><div class="section"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="_consumer_side_loan_issuance_final_step" href="#_consumer_side_loan_issuance_final_step"></a>2.4.4&nbsp;Consumer Side (Loan Issuance) Final Step</h3></div></div></div><p>As a developer of the Loan Issuance service (a consumer of the Fraud Detection server):</p><p><span class="strong"><strong>Merge branch to master.</strong></span></p><pre class="programlisting">git checkout master
git merge --no-ff contract-change-pr</pre><p><span class="strong"><strong>Work online.</strong></span></p><p>Now you can disable the offline work for Spring Cloud Contract Stub Runner and indicate
actually run those tests from your IDE.</p><p><span class="strong"><strong>Deploy your app.</strong></span></p><p>Once you finish your work, you can deploy your change. First, merge the branch:</p><pre class="programlisting">$ git checkout master
$ git merge --no-ff contract-change-pr
$ git push origin master</pre><p>Your CI might run something like <code class="literal">./mvnw clean deploy</code>, which would publish both the
application and the stub artifacts.</p></div><div class="section"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="_consumer_side_loan_issuance_final_step" href="#_consumer_side_loan_issuance_final_step"></a>2.4.4&nbsp;Consumer Side (Loan Issuance) Final Step</h3></div></div></div><p>As a developer of the Loan Issuance service (a consumer of the Fraud Detection server):</p><p><span class="strong"><strong>Merge branch to master.</strong></span></p><pre class="programlisting">$ git checkout master
$ git merge --no-ff contract-change-pr</pre><p><span class="strong"><strong>Work online.</strong></span></p><p>Now you can disable the offline work for Spring Cloud Contract Stub Runner and indicate
where the repository with your stubs is located. At this moment the stubs of the server
side are automatically downloaded from Nexus/Artifactory. You can set the value of
<code class="literal">stubsMode</code> to <code class="literal">REMOTE</code>. The following code shows an example of