GH-707 Fix Concurrent Modification exception on lookup
Rare condition but it appears that in some runtimes there could be multiple threads invoking lookup operation Added test to validate Resolves #707
This commit is contained in:
@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
import java.util.Collection;
|
||||
import java.util.Collections;
|
||||
import java.util.HashMap;
|
||||
import java.util.HashSet;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.Map;
|
||||
import java.util.Optional;
|
||||
import java.util.Set;
|
||||
import java.util.TreeSet;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArraySet;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Consumer;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Function;
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ public class SimpleFunctionRegistry implements FunctionRegistry, FunctionInspect
|
||||
|
||||
private final Field headersField;
|
||||
|
||||
private final Set<FunctionRegistration<?>> functionRegistrations = new HashSet<>();
|
||||
private final Set<FunctionRegistration<?>> functionRegistrations = new CopyOnWriteArraySet<>();
|
||||
|
||||
private final Map<String, FunctionInvocationWrapper> wrappedFunctionDefinitions = new HashMap<>();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ import java.util.Collections;
|
||||
import java.util.Date;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.Map;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Consumer;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Function;
|
||||
@@ -626,7 +630,26 @@ public class BeanFactoryAwareFunctionRegistryTests {
|
||||
assertThat(result.size()).isEqualTo(3);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
// see GH-707
|
||||
public void testConcurrencyOnLookup() throws Exception {
|
||||
AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger();
|
||||
|
||||
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
|
||||
FunctionCatalog catalog = this.configureCatalog(SampleFunctionConfiguration.class);
|
||||
for (int y = 0; y < 10; y++) {
|
||||
executor.execute(() -> {
|
||||
assertThat((FunctionInvocationWrapper) catalog.lookup("uppercase|reverse", "application/json")).isNotNull();
|
||||
counter.incrementAndGet();
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
executor.shutdown();
|
||||
executor.awaitTermination(10000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
|
||||
assertThat(counter.get()).isEqualTo(100);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@EnableAutoConfiguration
|
||||
public static class PojoToMessageFunctionCompositionConfiguration {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user