GH-707 Fix Concurrent Modification exception on lookup
Rare condition but it appears that in some runtimes there could be multiple threads invoking lookup operation Added test to validate Resolves #707
This commit is contained in:
@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
import java.util.Collection;
|
||||
import java.util.Collections;
|
||||
import java.util.HashMap;
|
||||
import java.util.HashSet;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.Map;
|
||||
import java.util.Optional;
|
||||
import java.util.Set;
|
||||
import java.util.TreeSet;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArraySet;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Consumer;
|
||||
import java.util.function.Function;
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ public class SimpleFunctionRegistry implements FunctionRegistry, FunctionInspect
|
||||
|
||||
private final Field headersField;
|
||||
|
||||
private final Set<FunctionRegistration<?>> functionRegistrations = new HashSet<>();
|
||||
private final Set<FunctionRegistration<?>> functionRegistrations = new CopyOnWriteArraySet<>();
|
||||
|
||||
private final Map<String, FunctionInvocationWrapper> wrappedFunctionDefinitions = new HashMap<>();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user