Docs cleanup
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
[[dlq-partition-selection]]
|
||||
== Dead-Letter Topic Partition Selection
|
||||
= Dead-Letter Topic Partition Selection
|
||||
|
||||
By default, records are published to the Dead-Letter topic using the same partition as the original record.
|
||||
This means the Dead-Letter topic must have at least as many partitions as the original record.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
[[binding-and-binding-names]]
|
||||
== Binding and Binding names
|
||||
[[binding-names]]
|
||||
= Binding and Binding names
|
||||
|
||||
Binding is an abstraction that represents a bridge between sources and targets exposed by the binder and user code,
|
||||
This abstraction has a name and while we try to do our best to limit configuration required to run spring-cloud-stream applications,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
[[explicit-binding-creation]]
|
||||
=== Explicit binding creation
|
||||
= Explicit binding creation
|
||||
|
||||
In the previous section we explained how bindings are created implicitly driven by the names of `Function`, `Supplier` or `Consumer` beans provided by your application.
|
||||
However, there are times when you may need to create binding explicitly where bindings are not tied to any function. This is typically done to
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
[[functional-binding-names]]
|
||||
=== Functional binding names
|
||||
= Functional binding names
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike the explicit naming required by annotation-based support (legacy) used in the previous versions of spring-cloud-stream, the functional
|
||||
programming model defaults to a simple convention when it comes to binding names, thus greatly simplifying application configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user