Prior to this commit the Spring Expression Language (SpEL) was able to
properly parse an expression that uses the safe navigation operator
(?.) with a method that has a `void` return type (for example,
"myObject?.doSomething()"); however, SpEL was not able to evaluate or
compile such expressions.
This commit addresses the evaluation issue by selectively not boxing
the exit type descriptor (for inclusion in the generated bytecode) when
the method's return type is `void`.
This commit addresses the compilation issue by pushing a null object
reference onto the stack in the generated byte code when the method's
return type is `void`.
Closes gh-27421
This commit partially reverts 3b8dd0a5, which introduced a strict
validation in JmsAccessor#setSessionAcknowledgeMode that prevents use
of vendor-specific acknowledge modes.
See gh-31328
Prior to this commit, if a Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expression
contained property, field, or method references using the null-safe
navigation operator (?.), the generated AST String representation
incorrectly omitted the '?' characters.
For example, 'myProperty?.myMethod()' had a generated AST string
representation of 'myProperty.myMethod()'.
This commit addresses this by introducing isNullSafe() in
MethodReference and reworking the logic in
CompoundExpression.toStringAST().
Closes gh-31326
Since the rewrite of ConcurrentLruCache in Spring Framework 6.0, an
attempt to create a ConcurrentLruCache with zero capacity results in an
IllegalArgumentException even though the documentation states that zero
capacity indicates "no caching, always generating a new value".
This commit restores the ability to configure a ConcurrentLruCache with
zero capacity and introduces corresponding tests (which were first
verified against the 5.3.x branch to ensure backward compatibility).
See gh-26320
Closes gh-31317
This commit introduces initialize() methods in
AbstractRoutingDataSource and AbstractRoutingConnectionFactory as an
alternative to invoking afterPropertiesSet().
Closes gh-31248
Previously, MessagingMessageListenerAdapter or any adapter relying on
the default MessagingMessageConverter would log an incoming message
with a toString of the Message that does not provide any extra
information. This is due to the default implementation providing a
lazy resolution message that only attempts to extract the payload
when necessary.
This commit implements a toString method that uses the raw JMS message
if the payload is not available. If it is, the payload is used instead.
Closes gh-21265
Given a @Configuration class named org.example.AppConfig which
contains @Bean methods, in Spring Framework 5.3.x and previous
versions, the following classes were created when generating the CGLIB
proxy.
org.example.AppConfig$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$fd7e9baa
org.example.AppConfig$$FastClassBySpringCGLIB$$3fec86e
org.example.AppConfig$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$fd7e9baa$$FastClassBySpringCGLIB$$82534900
Those class names indicate that 1 class was generated for the proxy for
the @Configuration class itself and that 2 additional FastClass
classes were generated to support proxying of @Bean methods in
superclasses.
However, since Spring Framework 6.0, the following classes are created
when generating the CGLIB proxy.
org.example.AppConfig$$SpringCGLIB$$0
org.example.AppConfig$$SpringCGLIB$$1
org.example.AppConfig$$SpringCGLIB$$2
The above class names make it appear that 3 proxy classes are generated
for each @Configuration class, which is misleading.
To address that and to align more closely with how such generated
classes were named in previous versions of the framework, this commit
modifies SpringNamingPolicy so that generated class names once again
include "FastClass" when the generated class is for a CGLIB FastClass
as opposed to the actual proxy for the @Configuration class.
Consequently, with this commit the following classes are created when
generating the CGLIB proxy.
org.example.AppConfig$$SpringCGLIB$$0
org.example.AppConfig$$SpringCGLIB$$FastClass$$0
org.example.AppConfig$$SpringCGLIB$$FastClass$$1
Closes gh-31272
For equivalence, we only need to compare the preInstantiationPointcut
fields since they include the declaredPointcut fields. In addition, we
should not compare the aspectInstanceFactory fields since
LazySingletonAspectInstanceFactoryDecorator does not implement equals().
See gh-31238
